<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Motivation for inverse kinematics in proteins

One important application of inverse kinematics is in determining missing portions of protein structure. We traditionally depend on experimentaltechniques to provide us with the picture of an average structure for a protein. X-ray crystallography for example, relies on crystallizing proteinsand reporting the structure of the protein crystal within a certain resolution. One of the inherent problems with X-ray crystallography is thatmobile protein regions such as loops cause disorder in the crystal and as a consequence, coordinates for the atoms of these mobile regions cannot bereported. Often, in the PDB, crystallographically determined proteins are partially resolved, i.e. a portion of the structure may be missing due to itsintrinsic mobility. Even when experimental techniques such as NMR and cryo-EM can report an average picture of the fully resolved protein, the averagestructure reported is not indicative of the different conformations mobile regions can assume inside our cells at room temperature.

The specific problem of completing a partially resolved protein structure by finding conformations for its missing loop is known as the fragmentcompletion or the loop closure problem. Note that the loop closure problem is actually an inverse kinematics problem. Using sequence information alone, i.e.knowing the aminoacid sequence of the missing loop, one can generate starting loop conformations. The loop closure problem requires these loopconformations to be geometrically constrained by attaching them to the portion of the protein structure that is experimentally determined.Note that, as the picture below indicates, one can generate many loop conformations in space through forward kinematics. One end of the loop can beattached to its counterpart in the protein through translation alone. The other end however, needs to be attached without breaking bonds or stretchingbond angles. One way to do this is through inverse kinematics; that is, knowing the goal position in space for the end of the loop, can we solve forthe dihedral DOFs of the loop conformation? This question can be answered by Inverse Kinematics techniques.

One "sticky" end of the loop can be attached to its stationary counterpart in the protein through translation. The other endneeds to move towards its goal location by solving an Inverse Kinematics problem.

Inverse kinematics for a polypeptide chain

Cyclic coordinate descent (ccd)

In this assignment you will complete a loop portion in the 1COA structure of the CI2 protein. X-ray crystallography completely resolves the 1COAstructure. However, even though a long loop region from residue 34 to residue 46 is present in the native conformation of 1COA, an interestingexercise is to pretend this loop region cannot be determined. Using an inverse kinematics approach, you will sample many potential loops that canall complete the 1COA structure and compare them to the native conformation obtained through X-ray crystallography. An important questionto answer is whether your loop closure algorithm can recover/predict the conformational state of this loop region in CI2; that is, how differentare your loops from the one in the native conformation of CI2? You will implement a simple inverse kinematics technique, Cyclic Coordinate Descent(CCD) as presented in . For simplicity, you will work with the native backbone of CI2, whose respective native coordinates you can also obtain from the backbone_native.crd file.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Geometric methods in structural computational biology. OpenStax CNX. Jun 11, 2007 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10344/1.6
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Geometric methods in structural computational biology' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask