<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
By creating a system of IP law, the US government not only headed down a new, somewhat hairy, bureaucratic path, but itgave voice to a sense that there is a balance to be struck between the impossibility of restricting the circulation ofideas, and the need to find some way to reward individuals who spend their lives inventing, authoring, or otherwise creatingand improvig ideas.
From this constitutional mandate, Congress has passed a number of federal laws, which both govern the legal and illegal aspects of IPand actually create institutions to manage and oversee the resulting issues. These three federal areas are copyright, patent and trademark(trademark actually derives from the constitution in Section 8, clause 3, the power to regulate interstate commerce). In addition to thesethree main areas, there is also law relating to "trade secrets" which is not federal, but state (in the US) and generally functions only toprotect commercial enterprises from the unfair appropriation of information it has taken steps to protect. (Compare this with thenotion of personal privacy; is there a version of a "trade secret" for individuals?)
In the case of copyright, the Library of Congress was designated as the body which would house copyrightedworks, maintain a registry, and publish circulars concerning the rules and regulations (Title 17). In the case of patents the congress created a new office, the Patent and Trademark Office.The USPTO oversees patent law (title 35) and trademark law (Section 22 of Title 15). In addition, this institution also publishes its ownelaborate Code of Federal Regulations that govern how the office will grant and review patents and trademarks--that is, how it will carryout the federal law.
I write this module today, and I live to the year 2066 (hallelujah!). When can you make use of it?
It's a trick question, this text is available under a license that allows you to use it now. Nonethless, the copyright on thistext will last until Jan 20. 2136. That's 132 years from now.
Other questions:
tangible expression 102(b): In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to anyidea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form inwhich it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.
Explicit exclusive rights: see section 106.
Fair Use and explicit limitations on rights: see section 107 on fair use (see also section 110, what kind of limitations doesthis create on the notion of creativity/originality in the classroom)?
Rights in intangible vs. tangible objects, implications of ownership.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Text as property/property as text' conversation and receive update notifications?