<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Suppose S is a subset of R 2 , and that f is a continuous real-valued function on S . If both partial derivatives of f exist at each point of the interior S 0 of S , and both are continuous on S 0 , then f is said to belong to C 1 ( S ) . If all k th order mixed partial derivatives exist at each point of S 0 , and all of them are continuous on S 0 , then f is said to belong to C k ( S ) . Finally, if all mixed partial derivatives, of arbitrary orders, exist and are continuous on S 0 , then f is said to belong to C ( S ) .

  1. Suppose f is a real-valued function of two real variables and that it is differentiable, as a function of two real variables, at the point ( a , b ) . Show that the numbers L 1 and L 2 in the definition are exactly the partial derivatives of f at ( a , b ) . That is,
    L 1 = t i a l f t i a l x ( a , b ) = lim h 0 f ( a + h , b ) - f ( a , b ) h
    and
    L 2 = t i a l f t i a l y ( a , b ) = lim h 0 f ( a , b + h ) - f ( a , b ) h .
  2. Define f on R 2 as follows: f ( 0 , 0 ) = 0 , and if ( x , y ) ( 0 , 0 ) , then f ( x , y ) = x y / ( x 2 + y 2 ) . Show that both partial derivatives of f at ( 0 , 0 ) exist and are 0. Show also that f is not , as a function of two real variables, differentiable at ( 0 , 0 ) . HINT: Let h and k run through the numbers 1 / n .
  3. What do parts (a) and (b) tell about the relationship between a function of two real variables being differentiable at a point ( a , b ) and its having both partial derivatives exist at ( a , b ) ?
  4. Suppose f = u + i v is a complex-valued function of a complex variable, and assume that f is differentiable, as a function of a complex variable, at a point c = a + b i ( a , b ) . Prove that the real and imaginary parts u and v of f are differentiable, as functions of two real variables. Relate the five quantities
    t i a l u t i a l x ( a , b ) , t i a l u t i a l y ( a , b ) , t i a l v t i a l x ( a , b ) , t i a l v t i a l y ( a , b ) , and f ' ( c ) .

Perhaps the most interesting theorem about partial derivatives is the “mixed partials are equal” theorem. That is, f x y = f y x . The point is that this is not always the case. An extra hypothesis is necessary.

Theorem on mixed partials

Let f : S R be such that both second order partials derivatives f x y and f y x exist at a point ( a , b ) of the interior of S , and assume in addition that one of these second order partials exists at every point in a disk B r ( a , b ) around ( a , b ) and that it is continuous at the point ( a , b ) . Then f x y ( a , b ) = f y x ( a , b ) .

Suppose that it is f y x that is continuous at ( a , b ) . Let ϵ > 0 be given, and let δ 1 > 0 be such that if | ( c , d ) - ( a , b ) | < δ 1 then | f y x ( c , d ) - f y x ( a , b ) | < ϵ . Next, choose a δ 2 such that if 0 < | k | < δ 2 , then

| f x y ( a , b ) - f x ( a , b + k ) - f x ( a , b ) k | < ϵ ,

and fix such a k . We may also assume that | k | < δ 1 / 2 . Finally, choose a δ 3 > 0 such that if 0 < | h | < δ 3 , then

| f x ( a , b + k ) - f ( a + h , b + k ) - f ( a , b + k ) h | < | k | ϵ ,

and

| f x ( a , b ) - f ( a + h , b ) - f ( a , b ) h | < | k | ϵ ,

and fix such an h . Again, we may also assume that | h | < δ 1 / 2 .

In the following calculation we will use the Mean Value Theorem twice.

0 | f x y ( a , b ) - f y x ( a , b ) | | f x y ( a , b ) - f x ( a , b + k ) - f x ( a , b ) k | + | f x ( a , b + k ) - f x ( a , b ) k - f y x ( a , b ) | ϵ + | f x ( a , b + k ) - f ( a + h , b + k ) - f ( a , b + k ) h k | + | f ( a + h , b ) - f ( a , b ) h - f x ( a , b ) k | + | f ( a + h , b + k ) - f ( a , b + k ) + ( f ( a + h , b ) - f ( a , b ) ) h k - f y x ( a , b ) | < 3 ϵ + | f ( a + h , b + k ) - f ( a , b + k ) + ( f ( a + h , b ) - f ( a , b ) ) h k - f y x ( a , b ) | = 3 ϵ + | f y ( a + h , b ' ) - f y ( a , b ' ) h - f y x ( a , b ) | = 3 ϵ + | f y x ( a ' , b ' ) - f y x ( a , b ) | < 4 ϵ ,

because b ' is between b and b + k , and a ' is between a and a + h , so that | ( a ' , b ' ) - ( a , b ) | < δ 1 / 2 < δ 1 . Hence, | f x y ( a , b ) - f y x ( a , b ) < 4 ϵ , for an arbitrary ϵ , and so the theorem is proved.

Questions & Answers

what are components of cells
ofosola Reply
twugzfisfjxxkvdsifgfuy7 it
Sami
58214993
Sami
what is a salt
John
the difference between male and female reproduction
John
what is computed
IBRAHIM Reply
what is biology
IBRAHIM
what is the full meaning of biology
IBRAHIM
what is biology
Jeneba
what is cell
Kuot
425844168
Sami
what is cytoplasm
Emmanuel Reply
structure of an animal cell
Arrey Reply
what happens when the eustachian tube is blocked
Puseletso Reply
what's atoms
Achol Reply
discuss how the following factors such as predation risk, competition and habitat structure influence animal's foraging behavior in essay form
Burnet Reply
cell?
Kuot
location of cervical vertebra
KENNEDY Reply
What are acid
Sheriff Reply
define biology infour way
Happiness Reply
What are types of cell
Nansoh Reply
how can I get this book
Gatyin Reply
what is lump
Chineye Reply
what is cell
Maluak Reply
what is biology
Maluak
what is vertibrate
Jeneba
what's cornea?
Majak Reply
what are cell
Achol
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Analysis of functions of a single variable. OpenStax CNX. Dec 11, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11249/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask