-
Home
- Rice university’s nsf advance
- Rice university’s nsf advance
- Promotion and tenure
Panel discussion presented by Jennifer West and Kathy Matthews at the 2011 NSF ADVANCE Workshop: Negotiating the Ideal Faculty Position, A Workshop for Underrepresented PhDs and Postdocs in Science, Engineering and Psychology September 18-20, 2010
Goals
- Institution
- Tenure is a life-long commitment by the university to you
- Successful faculty – innovators, leaders, producers
- Research objectives need to align with institutional directions
- You
- Faculty position that meets your own research and career objectives
- Member of functional, innovative and forward-looking department and institution
- Security offered by tenure
What can i do now?
Think about your steps all along the way
- Consistently evaluate your own progress
- Goals
- Mechanisms to get there
- Ways to learn from others and engage them
- Keep data on all your activities
- Ask for feedback
- Grant writing
- Papers
- Teaching
- Research program organization and development
This process is the accumulation of years of effort
THINK AHEAD!!
Understand the general process
- Learn about the promotion and tenure process at your institution
- Ask about the process at every stage if you have questions
- Request a copy of the policy
- Be sure when you are interviewing that the policy is consistent with your personal goals
- Understand the balance of teaching, research, and service that the institution AND the department will expect
- Understand the audience(s) for the materials
General process — the dossier
Dossier
- Summary of your independent career at institution
- Information on all aspects of your career
- Research summary (publications, grants, citations, awards)
- Teaching summary (courses, evaluations, awards)
- Service summary (activities, awards)
- Inside reviews/letters
- Outside letters –
very important
- Writers identified by department
- Also usually writers identified by individual
Dossier components
- CV as summary of career
- Education
- Honors
- Teaching/advising/mentoring
- Citations
- Grants
- Publications
- Research/teaching summary written by candidate
- Outside letters
What happens after dossier is prepared?
- Department review
- Tenured faculty generally involved in decision to recommend or deny tenure
- Department chair writes letter
- Some schools have subcommittee
- School review
- Often school-level committee reviews and makes recommendation to dean
- Dean makes recommendation
- Promotion/Tenure Committee (Provost)
- Makes recommendation to President
- President sometimes makes final decision
What happens after dossier is prepared?
- Department review
- School review
- Promotion/Tenure Committee (Provost)
- President may make final decision
Multiple levels of review — no one person makes the decision! Many voices are part of the process.
General process
- Understand the timing of preparing the dossier, what you should submit
and when
- Think carefully about names for Outside Letters
- Understand the process completely
- Don’t wait until the last minute to prepare your materials
- Think about your research/teaching summary
- Ensure that your papers are submitted in a timely way
- Ask QUESTIONS if you do not understand
Outside letters
- Highly influential in decision process
- May have opportunity to suggest names
- Develop relationships - create a network – MARKET yourself!
- Post-decision: Ask about possibility for feedback from the letters (can be useful)
Source:
OpenStax, Rice university’s nsf advance program’s negotiating the ideal faculty position workshop master collection of presentations. OpenStax CNX. Mar 08, 2012 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11413/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.