<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Let be a bounded sequence of real numbers with
and Prove that and satisfy the following properties.
We introduce next another property that a sequence can possess. It looks very like the definition of a convergent sequence, but it differs in a crucial way, and thatis that this definition only concerns the elements of the sequence and not the limit
A sequence of real or complex numbers is a Cauchy sequence if for every there existsa natural number such that if and then
REMARK No doubt, this definition has something to do with limits. Any time there is a positive and an we must be near some kind of limit notion.The point of the definition of a Cauchy sequence is that there is no explicit mention of what the limit is. It isn't that theterms of the sequence are getting closer and closer to some number it's that the terms of the sequence are getting closer and closer to each other. This subtle difference is worth some thought.
Prove that a Cauchy sequence is bounded. (Try to adjust the proof of [link] to work for this situation.)
The next theorem, like the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, seems to be quite abstract, but it also turns out to be a very useful tool for proving theorems about continity, differentiability, etc.In the proof, the completeness of the set of real numbers will be crucial. This theorem is not true in ordered fields that are not complete.
A sequence of real or complex numbers is convergent if and only if it is a Cauchy sequence.
If then given choose so that if From the triangle inequality, and by adding and subtracting we obtain that if and Hence, if is convergent, then is a Cauchy sequence.
Conversely, if is a cauchy sequence, then is bounded by the previous exercise. Now we use the fact that is a sequence of real or complex numbers.Let be a cluster point of We know that one exists by the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem. Let us show that in fact this number not only is a cluster point but that it is in fact the limit of the sequence Given choose so that whenever both and Let be a subsequence of that converges to Because is strictly increasing, we may choose a so that and also so that Then, if then both and this particular are larger than or equal to Therefore, this completes the proof that
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?