| << Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Card 20 / 32:
Explain why the year 1800 was not a leap year, even though years divisible by four are normally considered to be leap years.
The course author didn't provide an answer for this question
| Previous Card | ← Previous Card Button |
| Next Card | → Next Card Button |
| Flip Card | ↑ / ↓ / Return / Space |
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Astronomy' conversation and receive update notifications?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|