<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Substituting the given numbers:
Now we can calculate the initial speed of the truck:
Check Your Understanding Suppose there had been no friction (the collision happened on ice); that would make zero, and thus , which is obviously wrong. What is the mistake in this conclusion?
If zero friction acts on the car, then it will continue to slide indefinitely ( ), so we cannot use the work-kinetic-energy theorem as is done in the example. Thus, we could not solve the problem from the information given.
Conservation of momentum is crucial to our understanding of atomic and subatomic particles because much of what we know about these particles comes from collision experiments.
At the beginning of the twentieth century, there was considerable interest in, and debate about, the structure of the atom. It was known that atoms contain two types of electrically charged particles: negatively charged electrons and positively charged protons. (The existence of an electrically neutral particle was suspected, but would not be confirmed until 1932.) The question was, how were these particles arranged in the atom? Were they distributed uniformly throughout the volume of the atom (as J.J. Thomson proposed), or arranged at the corners of regular polygons (which was Gilbert Lewis’ model), or rings of negative charge that surround the positively charged nucleus—rather like the planetary rings surrounding Saturn (as suggested by Hantaro Nagaoka), or something else?
The New Zealand physicist Ernest Rutherford (along with the German physicist Hans Geiger and the British physicist Ernest Marsden ) performed the crucial experiment in 1909. They bombarded a thin sheet of gold foil with a beam of high-energy (that is, high-speed) alpha-particles (the nucleus of a helium atom). The alpha-particles collided with the gold atoms, and their subsequent velocities were detected and analyzed, using conservation of momentum and conservation of energy.
If the charges of the gold atoms were distributed uniformly (per Thomson), then the alpha-particles should collide with them and nearly all would be deflected through many angles, all small; the Nagaoka model would produce a similar result. If the atoms were arranged as regular polygons (Lewis), the alpha-particles would deflect at a relatively small number of angles.
What actually happened is that nearly none of the alpha-particles were deflected. Those that were, were deflected at large angles, some close to —those alpha-particles reversed direction completely ( [link] ). None of the existing atomic models could explain this. Eventually, Rutherford developed a model of the atom that was much closer to what we now have—again, using conservation of momentum and energy as his starting point.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'University physics volume 1' conversation and receive update notifications?