15.4 Carnot’s perfect heat engine: the second law of thermodynamics  (Page 9/7)

We know from the second law of thermodynamics that a heat engine cannot be 100% efficient, since there must always be some heat transfer $Q_{\text{c}}$ to the environment, which is often called waste heat. How efficient, then, can a heat engine be? This question was answered at a theoretical level in 1824 by a young French engineer, Sadi Carnot (1796–1832), in his study of the then-emerging heat engine technology crucial to the Industrial Revolution. He devised a theoretical cycle, now called the Carnot cycle    , which is the most efficient cyclical process possible. The second law of thermodynamics can be restated in terms of the Carnot cycle, and so what Carnot actually discovered was this fundamental law. Any heat engine employing the Carnot cycle is called a Carnot engine    .

What is crucial to the Carnot cycle—and, in fact, defines it—is that only reversible processes are used. Irreversible processes involve dissipative factors, such as friction and turbulence. This increases heat transfer $Q_{\text{c}}$ to the environment and reduces the efficiency of the engine. Obviously, then, reversible processes are superior.

[link] shows the $\text{PV}$ diagram for a Carnot cycle. The cycle comprises two isothermal and two adiabatic processes. Recall that both isothermal and adiabatic processes are, in principle, reversible.

Carnot also determined the efficiency of a perfect heat engine—that is, a Carnot engine. It is always true that the efficiency of a cyclical heat engine is given by:

What Carnot found was that for a perfect heat engine, the ratio $Q_{\text{c}}/Q_{\text{h}}$ equals the ratio of the absolute temperatures of the heat reservoirs. That is, $Q_{\text{c}}/Q_{\text{h}}=T_{\text{c}}/T_{\text{h}}$ for a Carnot engine, so that the maximum or Carnot efficiency     ${\mathrm{Eff}}_{\text{C}}$ is given by

where $T_{\text{h}}$ and $T_{\text{c}}$ are in kelvins (or any other absolute temperature scale). No real heat engine can do as well as the Carnot efficiency—an actual efficiency of about 0.7 of this maximum is usually the best that can be accomplished. But the ideal Carnot engine, like the drinking bird above, while a fascinating novelty, has zero power. This makes it unrealistic for any applications.