<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
In general, we will write , where and are relatively prime.
Now we will present the construction of for general . Again, the idea will be to write both and as homogeneous Cantor sets with the same scaling factor, in this case, . For convenience, we will define .
We start with the set . Remember that we may write this set in the form
so that an offset at the stage of the construction may be represented as
Then, we factor out a and substitute with to get
Rewriting ,
Then we combine the sums to get
where is the standard floor function. Note that is a binary word of length composed of groups of repeated letters. There are such words corresponding to the offsets of at this stage, so that all possibilities for are obtained. Similarly, we may write a -stage offset of in the form
so that is also a binary word of length composed of groups of repeated letters. Then, finally, we let be the set of -stage offsets of , be the set of -stage offsets of and write
where we look at in the following way: given and , we have
and we can write a ternary word to describe this offset . With a slight abuse of notation, we write and call the set of all such .
It is clear that this sum is self-similar in the sense discussed previously with homogeneous Cantor sets. This, along with the fact that , allows us to consider this set as the infinite intersection
Here, is the stage of the construction of , in the sense that it is the union of intervals of length where is the number of offsets in . Note that some of these intervals might overlap. The next proposition is concerned with the computation of the value of .
Proposition 4.1 For every where , the set has exactly elements.
For ease of reading, we will write in place of . [Proof of the Proposition]Let such a fraction be given. Clearly, we have that since each element can be expressed as the "sum" of two binary words and . Since there are such and such , there are at most possibilities for . Additionally, since and are relatively prime, it is easy to see that if and only if or . What is left to show is that there are exactly two pairs and , with or , such that . In fact, these pairs are and ; in both cases, we have
First, we will show that for all with , there is a unique pair such that , and then we will show that when , the only pairs for which are the two given above. Both of these statements rest on the following lemma.
Lemma 4.2 Given , where and are initially unknown, and one letter of or , the remaining letters of and are uniquely determined.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'The art of the pfug' conversation and receive update notifications?