<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
By way of contradiction, suppose is not contained in , and let be a complex number that is not in We have that which implies that for all Consider the function defined on the closed disk by Then is continuous on the closed disk and differentiable on Moreover, is not a constant function, for if it were, would also be a constant function on and therefore, by the Identity Theorem, constant on all of whichg is not the case by hypothesis. Hence, by the Maximum Modulus Principle,the maximum value of only occurs on the boundary of this disk. That is, there exists a point such that for all But then
which gives the desired contradiction. Therefore, the entire disk belongs to and hence the point belongs to the interior of the set Since this holds for any point it follows that is open, as desired.
Now we can give the version of the Inverse Function Theorem for complex variables.
Let be a piecewise smooth geometric set, and suppose is continuously differentiable at a point and assume that Then:
Arguing by contradiction, suppose that is not one-to-one on any disk Then, for each natural number there must exist two points and such that and If we write then we would have that for all So, by part (c) of [link] , there must exist for each a point such that is on the line segment joining and and for which
Similarly, applying the same kind of reasoning to there must exist points on the segment joining to such that
If we define vectors and by
and
then we have that both and are perpendicular to the nonzero vector Therefore, and are linearly dependent, whence
Now, since both and converge to the point and the partial derivatives of and are continuous at we deduce that
Now, from [link] , this would imply that and this is a contradiction. Hence, there must exist an for which is one-to-one on and this proves part (1).
Because is one-to-one on is obviously not a constant function. So, by the Open Mapping Theorem, the point belongs to the interior of the range of and this proves part (2).
Now write for the restriction of to the disk Then is one-to-one. According to part (2) of [link] , we can prove that is differentiable at by showing that
That is, we need to show that, given an there exists a such that if then
First of all, because the function is continuous at the point there exists an such that if then
Next, because is differentiable at there exists a such that if then
Now, by [link] , is continuous at the point and therefore there exists a such that if then
So, if then
But then,
from which it follows that
as desired.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?