<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
We can now prove the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, the last of our primary goals. One final trumpet fanfare, please!

We can now prove the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, the last of our primary goals. One final trumpet fanfare, please!

Fundamental theorem of algebra

Let p ( z ) be a nonconstant polynomial of a complex variable. Then there exists a complex number z 0 such that p ( z 0 ) = 0 . That is, every nonconstant polynomial of a complex variable has a root in the complex numbers.

We prove this theorem by contradiction. Thus, suppose that p is a nonconstant polynomial of degree n 1 , and that p ( z ) is never 0. Set f ( z ) = 1 / p ( z ) , and observe that f is defined and differentiable at every point z C . We will show that f is a constant function, implying that p = 1 / f is a constant, and that will give the contradiction.We prove that f is constant by showing that its derivative is identically 0, and we compute its derivative by using the Cauchy Integral Formula for the derivative.

From part (4) of [link] , we recall that there exists a B > 0 such that | c n | 2 | z | n | p ( z ) | , for all z for which | z | B , and where c n is the (nonzero) leading coefficient of the polynomial p . Hence, | f ( z ) | M | z | n for all | z | B , where we write M for 2 / | c n | . Now, fix a point c C . Because f is differentiable on the open set U = C , we can use the corollary to [link] to compute the derivative of f at c by using any of the curves C r that bound the disks B r ( c ) , and we choose an r large enough so that | c + r e i t | B for all 0 t 2 π . Then,

| f ' ( c ) | = | 1 2 π i C r f ( ζ ) ( ζ - c ) 2 d ζ | = 1 2 π | 0 2 π f ( c + r e i t ) ( c + r e i t - c ) 2 i r e i t d t | 1 2 π r 0 2 π | f ( c + r e i t ) | d t 1 2 π r 0 2 π M | c + r e i t | n d t M r B n .

Hence, by letting r tend to infinity, we get that

| f ' ( c ) | lim r M r B n = 0 ,

and the proof is complete.

REMARK

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra settles a question first raised back in [link] . There, we introduced a number I that was a root of the polynomial x 2 + 1 . We did this in order to build a number system in which negative numbers would have square roots. We adjoined the “number” i to the set of real numbers to form the set of complex numbers,and we then saw that in fact every complex number z has a square root. However, a fear was that,in order to build a system in which every number has an n th root for every n , we would continually need to be adjoining new elements to our number system.However, the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra shows that this is not necessary. The set of complex numbers is already rich enough to contain all n th roots and even more.

Practically the same argument as in the preceding proof establishes another striking result.

Liouville

Suppose f is a bounded, everywhere differentiable function of a complex variable. Then f must be a constant function.

Prove Liouville's Theorem.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Analysis of functions of a single variable. OpenStax CNX. Dec 11, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11249/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask