<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Data on art history-related Ph.D.’s conferred over time were obtained from the National Center for EducationStatistics’ (NCES) online Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). As explained on the IPEDS web site ( (External Link) ), "The IPEDS system is builtaround a series of interrelated surveys to collect institution-level data in such areas as enrollments, programcompletions, faculty, staff, and finances." By law, all institutions of higher education wishing to participate in anyFederal financial assistance programs must complete all IPEDS surveys each year, making IPEDS the most comprehensive source ofstatistical data about postsecondary education in the United States.
The system contains data on degrees awarded (by institution and by instructional program) going back to the1979-80 academic year. Using the IPEDS system, it was possible to extract year-by-year data on the number of art history-relatedPh.D.’s awarded at each institution in each academic year from 1979-80 through 2003-04. (The only exceptions were for the academicyears 1980-81, 1981-82, 1982-83, and 1998-99, years during which data were not collected.)
Data were compiled using two different strategies and then cross-checked for consistency. The first methodinvolved extracting information directly from IPEDS, using NCES’ online "Dataset Cutting Tool" at (External Link) . To access the Dataset Cutting Tool, public users must log on to the system using the "GuestLevel" access link. After agreeing to the terms of the NCES Data User Agreement, users are redirected to a web page that allowsaccess to the Dataset Cutting Tool. Users then select, from a series of menus, various options that allow a customized data setto be created that contains specific data of interest to the user. The following procedure was used to extract year-by-year data forPh.D.’s awarded in the field of art history:
The above procedure was replicated for each academic year for which data were available between 1979-80 and2003-04. The resulting data files were then merged, so that trends could be examined in the awarding of art history-related Ph.D.’sover time.
The second method used to compile these trend data was to collect lists of institutions known to have Ph.D.programs in art history (and/or related areas). One list of such institutions was obtained from the College Art Association; asecond list was obtained from the web site, www.gradschools.com . Based on the results obtained from the IPEDS analyses, a third listwas compiled consisting of all institutions that appeared in the IPEDS data files as having awarded art history-related doctoraldegrees between 1979 and 2004. These three lists were combined into a master list, which was then provided to a researcher at NCES, whoran a second complete set of analyses focusing strictly on the institutions represented in the merged list. Hisanalyses almost exactly matched the earlier analyses we had run using IPEDS. Theresults shown in this research report are taken from the analyses conducted by the NCES researcher, based on the list of academicinstitutions we provided.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'The state of scholarly publishing in the history of art and architecture' conversation and receive update notifications?