5.3 Combinatorial algorithms  (Page 5/2)

In addition to convex optimization and greedy pursuit approaches, there is another important class of sparse recovery algorithms that we will refer to as combinatorial algorithms . These algorithms, mostly developed by the theoretical computer science community, in many cases pre-date the compressive sensing literature but are highly relevant to the sparse signal recovery problem .

Setup

The oldest combinatorial algorithms were developed in the context of group testing   [link] , [link] , [link] . In the group testing problem, we suppose that there are $N$ total items, of which an unknown subset of $K$ elements are anomalous and need to be identified. For example, we might wish to identify defective products in an industrial setting, or identify a subset of diseased tissue samples in a medical context. In both of these cases the vector $x$ indicates which elements are anomalous, i.e., $x_i\ne 0$ for the $K$ anomalous elements and $x_i=0$ otherwise. Our goal is to design a collection of tests that allow us to identify the support (and possibly the values of the nonzeros) of $x$ while also minimizing the number of tests performed. In the simplest practical setting these tests are represented by a binary matrix $\Phi$ whose entries ${\phi }_{ij}$ are equal to 1 if and only if the $j^{\mathrm{th}}$ item is used in the $i^{\mathrm{th}}$ test. If the output of the test is linear with respect to the inputs, then the problem of recovering the vector $x$ is essentially the same as the standard sparse recovery problem.

Another application area in which combinatorial algorithms have proven useful is computation on data streams   [link] , [link] . Suppose that $x_i$ represents the number of packets passing through a network router with destination $i$ . Simply storing the vector $x$ is typically infeasible since the total number of possible destinations (represented by a 32-bit IP address) is $N=2^{32}$ . Thus, instead of attempting to store $x$ directly, one can store $y=\Phi x$ where $\Phi$ is an $M\times N$ matrix with $M\ll N$ . In this context the vector $y$ is often called a sketch . Note that in this problem $y$ is computed in a different manner than in the compressive sensing context. Specifically, in the network traffic example we do not ever observe $x_i$ directly; rather, we observe increments to $x_i$ (when a packet with destination $i$ passes through the router). Thus we construct $y$ iteratively by adding the $i^{\mathrm{th}}$ column to $y$ each time we observe an increment to $x_i$ , which we can do since $y=\Phi x$ is linear. When the network traffic is dominated by traffic to a small number of destinations, the vector $x$ is compressible, and thus the problem of recovering $x$ from the sketch $\Phi x$ is again essentially the same as the sparse recovery problem.

Several combinatorial algorithms for sparse recovery have been developed in the literature. A non-exhaustive list includes Random Fourier Sampling  [link] , HHS Pursuit  [link] , and Sparse Sequential Matching Pursuit  [link] . We do not provide a full discussion of each of these algorithms; instead, we describe two simple methods that highlight the flavors of combinatorial sparse recovery — count-min and count-median .