<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Evidence for a symptom

Sometimes the evidence dealt with is not evidence for the hypothesized condition, but for some condition which is stochastically related. For purposes of exposition, werefer to this intermediary condition as a symptom . Consider again the examples above.

HYPOTHESIS SYMPTOM EVIDENCE
Job success Personal traits Diagnostic test results
Presence of oil Geological structures Geophysical survey results
Operation of a device Physical condition Monitoring report
Market condition Test market condition Market survey result
Presence of a disease Physical symptom Test for symptom

We let S be the event the symptom is present. The usual case is that the evidence is directly related to the symptom and not the hypothesized condition.The diagnostic test results can say something about an applicant's personal traits, but cannot deal directly with the hypothesized condition. The testresults would be the same whether or not the candidate is successful in the job (he or she does not have the job yet). A geophysical survey deals withcertain structural features beneath the surface. If a fault or a salt dome is present, the geophysical results are the same whether or not there is oilpresent. The physical monitoring report deals with certain physical characteristics. Its reading is the same whether or not the device will fail. A market surveytreats only the condition in the test market. The results depend upon the test market, not the national market. A blood test may be for certainphysical conditions which frequently are related (at least statistically) to the disease. But the result of the blood test for the physical conditionis not directly affected by the presence or absence of the disease.

Under conditions of this type, we may assume

P ( E | S H ) = P ( E | S H c ) and P ( E | S c H ) = P ( E | S c H c )

These imply { E , H } ci | S and ci | S c . Now

P ( H | E ) P ( H c | E ) = P ( H E ) P ( H c E ) = P ( H E S ) + P ( H E S c ) P ( H c E S ) + P ( H c E S c ) = P ( H S ) P ( E | H S ) + P ( H S c ) P ( E | H S c ) P ( H c S ) P ( E | H c S ) + P ( H c S c ) P ( E | H c S c ) = P ( H S ) P ( E | S ) + P ( H S c ) P ( E | S c ) P ( H c S ) P ( E | S ) + P ( H c S c ) P ( E | S c )

It is worth noting that each term in the denominator differs from the corresponding term in the numerator by having H c in place of H . Before completing the analysis, it is necessary to consider how H and S are related stochastically in the data. Four cases may be considered.

  1. Data are P ( S | H ) , P ( S | H c ) , and P ( H ) .
  2. Data are P ( S | H ) , P ( S | H c ) , and P ( S ) .
  3. Data are P ( H | S ) , P ( H | S c ) , and P ( S ) .
  4. Data are P ( H | S ) , P ( H | S c ) , and P ( H ) .
  • P ( H | E ) P ( H c | E ) = P ( H ) P ( S | H ) P ( E | S ) + P ( H ) P ( S c | H ) P ( E | S c ) P ( H c ) P ( S | H c ) P ( E | S ) + P ( H c ) P ( S c | H c ) P ( E | S c )

    Geophysical survey

    Let H be the event of a successful oil well, S be the event there is a geophysical structure favorable to the presence of oil, and E be the event the geophysical survey indicates a favorable structure. We suppose { H , E } ci | S and ci | S c . Data are

    P ( H ) / P ( H c ) = 3 , P ( S | H ) = 0 . 92 , P ( S | H c ) = 0 . 20 , P ( E | S ) = 0 . 95 , P ( E | S c ) = 0 . 15

    Then

    P ( H | E ) P ( H c | E ) = 3 · 0 . 92 · 0 . 95 + 0 . 08 · 0 . 15 0 . 20 · 0 . 95 + 0 . 80 · 0 . 15 = 1329 155 = 8 . 5742
    so that P ( H | E ) = 1 - 155 1484 = 0 . 8956

    The geophysical result moved the prior odds of 3/1 to posterior odds of 8.6/1, with acorresponding change of probabilities from 0.75 to 0.90.

    Got questions? Get instant answers now!
  • Data are P ( S ) P ( S | H ) , P ( S | H c ) , P ( E | S ) . and P ( E | S c ) . If we can determine P ( H ) , we can proceed as in case a. Now by the law of total probability
    P ( S ) = P ( S | H ) P ( H ) + P ( S | H c ) [ 1 - P ( H ) ]
    which may be solved algebraically to give
    P ( H ) = P ( S ) - P ( S | H c ) P ( S | H ) - P ( S | H c )

    Geophysical survey revisited

    In many cases a better estimate of P ( S ) or the odds P ( S ) / P ( S c ) can be made on the basis of previous geophysical data. Suppose the prior odds for S are 3/1, so that P ( S ) = 0 . 75 . Using the other data in [link] , we have

    P ( H ) = P ( S ) - P ( S | H c ) P ( S | H ) - P ( S | H c ) = 0 . 75 - 0 . 20 0 . 92 - 0 . 20 = 55 / 72 , so that P ( H ) P ( H c ) = 55 / 17

    Using the pattern of case a, we have

    P ( H | E ) P ( H c | E ) = 55 17 · 0 . 92 · 0 . 95 + 0 . 08 · 0 . 15 0 . 20 · 0 . 95 + 0 . 80 · 0 . 15 = 4873 527 = 9 . 2467
    so that P ( H | E ) = 1 - 527 5400 = 0 . 9024
    Got questions? Get instant answers now!
    Usually data relating test results to symptom are of the form P ( E | S ) and P ( E | S c ) , or equivalent. Data relating the symptom and the hypothesized condition may go either way. Incases a and b, the data are in the form P ( S | H ) and P ( S | H c ) , or equivalent, derived from data showing the fraction of times the symptom is noted when the hypothesizedcondition is identified. But these data may go in the opposite direction, yielding P ( H | S ) and P ( H | S c ) , or equivalent. This is the situation in cases c and d.
  • Data are P ( E | S ) , P ( E | S c ) , P ( H | S ) , P ( H | S c ) and P ( S ) .

    Evidence for a disease symptom with prior P ( S )

    When a certain blood syndrome is observed, a given disease is indicated 93 percent of the time. The disease is found without this syndrome only three percent of the time. Atest for the syndrome has probability 0.03 of a false positive and 0.05 of a false negative. A preliminary examination indicates a probability 0.30 that a patienthas the syndrome. A test is performed; the result is negative. What is the probability the patient has the disease?

    Solution

    In terms of the notation above, the data are

    P ( S ) = 0 . 30 , P ( E | S c ) = 0 . 03 , P ( E c | S ) = 0 . 05 ,
    P ( H | S ) = 0 . 93 , and P ( H | S c ) = 0 . 03

    We suppose { H , E } ci | S and ci | S c .

    P ( H | E c ) P ( H c | E c ) = P ( S ) P ( H | S ) P ( E c | S ) + P ( S c ) P ( H | S c ) P ( E c | S c ) P ( S ) P ( H c | S ) P ( E c | S ) + P ( S c ) P ( H c | S c ) P ( E c | S c )
    = 0 . 30 · 0 . 93 · 0 . 05 + 0 . 70 · 0 . 03 · 0 . 97 0 . 30 · 0 . 07 · 0 . 05 + 0 . 70 · 0 . 97 · 0 . 97 = 429 8246

    which implies P ( H | E c ) = 429 / 8675 0 . 05 .

    Got questions? Get instant answers now!
  • This differs from case c only in the fact that a prior probability for H is assumed. In this case, we determine the corresponding probability for S by
    P ( S ) = P ( H ) - P ( H | S c ) P ( H | S ) - P ( H | S c )
    and use the pattern of case c.

    Evidence for a disease symptom with prior P ( H )

    Suppose for the patient in [link] the physician estimates the odds favoring the presence of the disease are 1/3, so that P ( H ) = 0 . 25 . Again, the test result is negative. Determine the posterior odds, given E c .

    Solution

    First we determine

    P ( S ) = P ( H ) - P ( H | S c ) P ( H | S ) - P ( H | S c ) = 0 . 25 - 0 . 03 0 . 93 - 0 . 03 = 11 / 45

    Then

    P ( H | E c ) P ( H c | E c ) = ( 11 / 45 ) · 0 . 93 · 0 . 05 + ( 34 / 45 ) · 0 . 03 · 0 . 97 ( 11 / 45 ) · 0 . 07 · 0 . 05 + ( 34 / 45 ) · 0 . 97 · 0 . 97 = 15009 320291 = 0 . 047

    The result of the test drops the prior odds of 1/3 to approximately 1/21.

    Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Applied probability. OpenStax CNX. Aug 31, 2009 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10708/1.6
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Applied probability' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask