<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Let's see what the eigenvectors of $H$ are. These will be the finite-length signals that, when input into the system, emerge as outputs simply as scaled versions of themselves. In that sense, they are somehow fundamentally related to all LTI systems.
It so happens that, remarkably, any and all LTI systems for finite-length (length $N$) signals have the exact same set of eigenvectors! The eigenvectors for any LTI length-$N$ system are complex harmonic sinusoids: $s_k[n]~=~ \frac{e^{j \frac{2\pi}{N}kn}}{\sqrt{N}} ~=~ \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\left( \cos\!\left(\frac{2\pi}{N}kn\right) + j \sin\!\left(\frac{2\pi}{N}kn\right) \right), \qquad 0\leq n,k \leq N-1$So, if we have an LTI system--any LTI system--then giving an $s_k$ as an input will result in the output being $\lambda_k s_k$, with the particular values of $\lambda_k$ of course being dependent on the system: To prove this special property of LTI systems, we simply compute the circular convolution sum for an LTI system with arbitrary impulse response $h[n]$ and input of the form $\frac{e^{j \frac{2\pi}{N}kn}}{\sqrt{N}}$:$\begin{align*} s_k[n]\circledast h[n]&= \sum_{m=0}^{N-1} s_k[(n-m)_N]\,h[m]\\&= \sum_{m=0}^{N-1} \frac{e^{j \frac{2\pi}{N}k(n-m)_N}}{\sqrt N} \,h[m] \\&=\sum_{m=0}^{N-1} \frac{e^{j \frac{2\pi}{N}k(n-m)}}{\sqrt N} \,h[m]\\&=\sum_{m=0}^{N-1} \frac{e^{j \frac{2\pi}{N}kn}}{\sqrt N} e^{-j \frac{2\pi}{N}km} \, h[m] \\&=\left( \sum_{m=0}^{N-1} e^{-j \frac{2\pi}{N}km} \,h[m] \right)\frac{e^{j \frac{2\pi}{N}kn}}{\sqrt N}\\&=~ \lambda_k \, s_k[n]~,~\lambda_k=\left( \sum_{m=0}^{N-1} e^{-j \frac{2\pi}{N}km} \,h[m]\right) \end{align*}$ This proof reveals how we are to find the eigenvalues ($\lambda_k$) that correspond to each harmonic sinusoid eigenvector, they are simply the inner products of the eigenvectors with the system's impulse response. Each value $\lambda_k$ is called the system's frequency response at frequency $k$, because it indicates how the system scales inputs of that particular frequency. It is a significant enough characteristic of the system to warrant its own notation: $H[k]$.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Discrete-time signals and systems' conversation and receive update notifications?