<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Ecosystems are complex with many interacting parts, and dissecting the roles of these interacting components can be a challenge. Furthermore, ecosystems are routinely exposed to various disturbances, or changes in the environment that affect their compositions. For example, variations in rainfall and temperature can affect patterns and rates of plant growth, even though this may take several years. Many disturbances are a result of natural processes. For example, fire is a disturbance that can be caused by a lightning strike in a prairie or forest ecosystem. Recovery from disturbances can be highly variable as well; some ecosystems (e.g. prairie) are adapted to fire and can regenerate quickly. Others might recover more slowly. Other disturbances are the result of human activities. The impact of environmental disturbances caused by human activities is as important as the changes wrought by natural processes. Human agricultural practices, air pollution, acid rain, global deforestation, overfishing, eutrophication, oil spills, and illegal dumping on land and into the ocean are disturbances, and biological responses to these are of interest to ecologists and conservationists.
Equilibrium is the steady state of an ecosystem where all organisms are in balance with their environment and with each other. In ecology, two parameters are used to measure changes in ecosystems: resistance and resilience. The ability of an ecosystem to remain at equilibrium in spite of disturbances is called resistance. The speed at which an ecosystem recovers equilibrium after being disturbed is its resilience. Ecosystem resistance and resilience are especially important when considering human impact. The nature of an ecosystem may change to such a degree that it can lose its resilience entirely. This process can lead to the complete destruction or irreversible altering of the ecosystem.
The term “food chain” is sometimes used metaphorically to describe human social situations. In this sense, food chains are thought of as a competition for survival, such as “who eats whom?” Someone eats and someone is eaten. Therefore, it is not surprising that in our competitive “dog-eat-dog” society, individuals who are considered successful are seen as being "at the top of the food chain", consuming all others for their benefit, whereas the less successful are seen as being at the bottom.
The scientific understanding of a food chain is more precise than in its everyday usage. In ecology, a food chain is a linear sequence of organisms through which nutrients and energy pass: primary producers, primary consumers, and higher-level consumers are used to describe ecosystem structure and dynamics. There is a single path through the chain. Each organism in a food chain occupies what is called a trophic level (composed of organisms that share the same function in the food chain and the same nutritional relationship to the primary sources of energy). Depending on their role as producers or consumers, species or groups of species can be assigned to one or more trophic levels; for example bears eat plants (and thus are primary consumers) and also eat other animals (and thus are secondary or tertiary consumers).
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Principles of biology' conversation and receive update notifications?