<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Let be a subset of (or ), and Let be a function of a real (or complex) variable. We say that is continuously differentiable on if is differentiable at each point of and the function is continuous on We say that if is continuous on and continuously differentiable on We say that is 2-times continuously differentiable on if the first derivative is itself continuously differentiable on And, inductively, we say that is k-times continuously differentiable on if the st derivative of is itself continuously differentiable on We write for the th derivative of and we write if is continuous on and is times continuously differentiable on Of course, if then all the derivatives , for exist nd are continuous on (Why?)
For completeness, we define to be itself, and we say that if is continuous on and has infinitely many continuous derivatives on i.e., all of its derivatives exist and are continuous on
As in [link] , we say that is real-analytic (or complex-analytic ) on if it is expandable in a Taylor series around each point
REMARK Keep in mind that the definition above, as applied to functions whose domain is a nontrivial subset of has to do with functions of a complex variable that are continuously differentiable on the set We have seen that this is quite different from a function having continuous partial derivatives on We will return to partial derivatives at the end of this chapter.
Let be an open subset of (or ).
REMARK Suppose is an open subset of It is a famous result from the Theory of Complex Variables that if is in then is necessarily complex analytic on We will prove this amazing result in [link] . Part (3) of the theorem shows that the situation is quite different for real-valued functions of a real variable.
For part (1), see the exercise below. Part (2) is immediate from part (c) of [link] . Before finishing the proof of part (3), we present the following lemma:
Let be the function defined on all of as follows.
where is a fixed polynomial function and is a fixed nonnegative integer. Then is continuous at each point of
The assertion of the lemma is clear if To see that is continuous at 0, it will suffice to prove that
(Why?) But, for we know from part (b) of [link] that implying that Hence, for
and this tends to 0 as approaches 0 from the right, as desired.
Returning to the proof of [link] , we verify part (3) by observing that if is as in the preceding lemma then is actually differentiable, and its derivative is a function of the same sort. (Why?) It follows that any such function belongs to On the other hand, a nontrivial such cannot be expandable in a Taylor series around 0because of the Identity Theorem. (Take ) This completes the proof.
Suppose are real numbers. Show that there exists a function in such that for all for and for (If is close to and is close to then this function is a approximation to the step function that is 1 on the interval and 0 elsewhere.)
Let be expandable in a Taylor series around a point
Then for each
Because each derivative of a Taylor series function is again a Taylor series function, and because the value of a Taylor series function at the point is equal to its constant term we have that Computing the derivative of the derivative, we see that Continuing this, i.e., arguing by induction, we find that which proves the theorem.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?