4.4 Being an ethical job candidate  (Page 2/9)

What would you do if you were in maria's place?

• Accept the interview offer but not try to recruit any of your friends.
• Accept the interview offer and try to recruit some of your friends to go along.
• Refuse to accept the interview on moral grounds.
• Refuse to accept the interview because it would interfere with the class in Practical and Professional Ethics that you are currently taking.
• Report this company to the appropriate governmental agency since they are clearly distinguishing against candidates from so-called minority groups
• Your solution....

2. working for mega weapons

What should jorge do is he receives a request to interview with mega weapons?

• Jorge should not go to the interview because he is not "sincerely interested" in this position. His pacifism cancels out any possibility of "sincere interest".
• Jorge should accept this interview request because his obligations to his family outweigh matters of personal morality and personal conscience such as his pacifism.
• Jorge should accept this interview and a job offer, if one follows, precisely because of his pacifism. If he refuses then Mega Weapons will find a war monger who will do all kinds of harm. By taking the job and using his skills to minimize harm in weapons development Jorge is doing his best to realize the pacifist agenda.
• Jorge should set aside his pacifism and use his engineering skills to carry out politically sanctioned weapons projects just as a doctor should set aside personal likes or dislikes of a patient and exercise his or her skills dispassionately and professionally.
• Your solution...

Full and honest disclosure

• The job candidate is required to provide full information relative to the job description as advertised. This would include elements such as:
• Educational Experience
• Prior work experience
• Other job relevant skills and knowledge
• Do religion, sexual preference, marital status, political viewpoints, and recreational practices constitute job relevant matters? In other words, are these matters private to the job candidate or are there occasions when the prospective employer has a right to access this information?
• Distinguish between information to which an interviewer has a right and the means the interviewer has the right to use to uncover this information. Do interviewers have the right to require that job candidates (1) take polygraph examinations, (2) undergo drug tests, (3) take psychological profiling exams, (4) be subjected to "staged crises" to find out how a candidate would handle such an event? These may constitute information areas to which the prospective employer has a right, but does the interviewer also have a right to use these means to obtain this information?