<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
In the previous paragraphs it was assumed that we were sampling from a normal distribution and the variance was known. The null hypothesis was generally of the form .
There are essentially tree possibilities for the alternative hypothesis, namely that has increased,
To test against one of these tree alternative hypotheses, a random sample is taken from the distribution, and an observed sample mean, , that is close to supports . The closeness of to is measured in term of standard deviations of , which is sometimes called the standard error of the mean . Thus the statistic could be defined by
and the critical regions, at a significance level , for the tree respective alternative hypotheses would be:
In terms of these tree critical regions become
These tests and critical regions are summarized in TABLE 1 . The underlying assumption is that the distribution is and is known. Thus far we have assumed that the variance was known. We now take a more realistic position and assume that the variance is unknown. Suppose our null hypothesis is and the two-sided alternative hypothesis is . If a random sample is taken from a normal distribution ,let recall that a confidence interval for was based on
Critical Region | ||
---|---|---|
or | ||
or | ||
or |
This suggests that T might be a good statistic to use for the test with replaced by . In addition, it is the natural statistic to use if we replace by its unbiased estimator in in a proper equation. If we know that T has a t distribution with n -1 degrees of freedom. Thus, with ,
Accordingly, if and s are the sample mean and the sample standard deviation, the rule that rejects if and only if
Provides the test of the hypothesis with significance level . It should be noted that this rule is equivalent to rejecting if is not in the open confidence interval
Table 2 summarizes tests of hypotheses for a single mean, along with the three possible alternative hypotheses, when the underlying distribution is , is unknown, and . If n >31, use table 1 for approximate tests with replaced by s .
Critical Region | ||
---|---|---|
or | ||
or | ||
or |
Let X (in millimeters) equal the growth in 15 days of a tumor induced in a mouse. Assume that the distribution of X is . We shall test the null hypothesis millimeters against the two-sided alternative hypothesis is . If we use n =9 observations and a significance level of =0.10, the critical region is
If we are given that n =9, =4.3, and s =1.2, we see that
Thus and we accept (do not reject) at the =10% significance level. See Figure 1 .
In this example the use of the t -statistic with a one-sided alternative hypothesis will be illustrated.
In attempting to control the strength of the wastes discharged into a nearby river, a paper firm has taken a number of measures. Members of the firm believe that they have reduced the oxygen-consuming power of their wastes from a previous mean of 500. They plan to test against , using readings taken on n =25 consecutive days. If these 25 values can be treated as a random sample, then the critical region, for a significance level of =0.01, is
The observed values of the sample mean and sample standard deviation were =308.8 and s =115.15. Since we clearly reject the null hypothesis and accept . It should be noted, however, that although an improvement has been made, there still might exist the question of whether the improvement is adequate. The 95% confidence interval or for might the company answer that question.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Introduction to statistics' conversation and receive update notifications?