<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Having introduced a class of new functions (power series functions), we might well expect that some of these will have interestingand unexpected properties. So, which sets of coefficients might give us an exotic new function?Unfortunately, at this point in our development, we haven't much insight into this question. It is true, see [link] , that most power series functions that we naturally write down have finite radii of convergence.Such functions may well be new and fascinating, but as a first example, we would prefer to consider a power series function that is defined everywhere,i.e., one with an infinite radius of convergence. Again revisiting [link] , let us consider the coefficients This may seem a bit ad hoc, but let's have a look.
Define a power series function, denoted by exp, as follows:
We will call this function, with 20-20 hindsight, the exponential function.
What do we know about this function, apart from the fact that it is defined for all complex numbers?We certainly do not know that it has anything to do with the function that will come in the next chapter. We do know what the number is, but we do not know how to raise that number to a complex exponent.
All of the exponential function's coefficients are positive, and so by part (d) of [link] exp is not a rational function; it really is something new. It is natural to consider the even and odd parts and of this new function. And then, considering the constructions in [link] , to introduce the alternating versions and of them.
Define two power series functions cosh (hyperbolic cosine) and sinh (hyperbolic sine) by
and two other power series functions cos (cosine) and sin (sine) by
and
The five functions just defined are called the elementary transcendental functions , the and functions are called the basic hyperbolic functions, and the sine and cosine functions are called the basic trigonometric or circular functions. The connections between the hyperbolic functions and hyperbolic geometry, and the connection between the trigonometric functions and circles and triangles, will only emerge in the next chapter.From the very definitions, however, we can see a connection between the hyperbolic functions and the trigonometric functions.It's something like interchanging the roles of the real and imaginary axes. This is probably worth some more thought.
At this point, we probably need a little fanfare!
There exists a smallest positive number for which We will denote this distinguished number by the symbol
First we observe that is positive. Indeed, the infinite series for is alternating. It follows from the alternating series test (Theorem 2.18) that
Next, again using the alternating series test, we observe that Indeed,
Hence, by the intermediate value theorem, there must exist a number between 1 and 4 such that So, there is at least one positive number such that However, we must show that there is a smallest positive number satisfying this equation.
Let be the set of all for which Then is a nonempty set of real numbers that is bounded below. Define We need to prove that and that Clearly then it will be the smallest positive number for which
By [link] , there exists a sequence of elements of such that Since is continuous at it follows that Finally, if were equal to 0, then by the Identity Theorem, Theorem 3.14, we would have that for all Since this is clearly not the case, we must have that
Hence, is the smallest (minimum) positive number for which
As hinted at earlier, the connection between this number and circles is not at all evident at the moment. For instance, you probably will not be able to answer the questions in the next exercise.
REMARK Defining to be the smallest positive zero of the sine function may strike many people as very much “out of the blue.”However, the zeroes of a function are often important numbers. For instance, a zero of the function is a square root of 2, and that number we know was exztremely important to the Greeks as they began thestudy of what real numbers are. A zero of the function is something whose square is -1, i.e., negative. The idea of a square being negative was implausible at first, but is fundamental now, so that the zero of this particular function is critical for our understanding to numbers.Very likely, then, the zeroes of any “new” function will be worth studying. For instance, we will soon see that, perhaps disappointingly, there are no zeroes for the exponentialfunction: is never 0. Maybe it's even more interesting then that there are zeroes of the sine function.
The next theorem establishes some familiar facts about the trigonometric functions.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?