Generalizing simultaneous equations.
Here are the
generic simultaneous equations .
-
-
I call them “generic” because every possible pair of simultaneous equations looks exactly like that, except with numbers instead of
,
,
,
,
, and
. We are going to solve these equations.
Very important!!!
When I say “solve it” I mean find a formula
blah-blah where the
blah-blah has only
,
,
,
,
, and
: no
or
. And, of course,
some
different formula with only
,
,
,
,
, and
. If we can do that, we will be able to use these formulas to immediately solve
any pair of simultaneous equations, just by plugging in the numbers.
We can solve this by elimination or by substitution. I am going to solve for
by elimination. I will use all the exact same steps we have always used in class.
Step 1: make the coefficients of x line up
To do this, I will multiply the top equation by
and the bottom equation by
.
Step 2: subtract the second equation from the first
This will make the
terms go away.
Step 3: solve for y
This is something we’ve done many times in class, right? First, pull out a
; then divide by what is in parentheses.
So what did we do?
We have come up with a totally generic formula for finding
in any simultaneous equations. For instance, suppose we have…
We now have a new way of solving this equation: just plug into
. That will tell us that
Didja get it?
Here’s how to find out.
- Do the whole thing again, starting with the generic simultaneous equations, except solve for
instead of
.
- Use your formula to find
in the two equations I did at the bottom (under “So what did we do?”)
- Test your answer by plugging your
and my
into those equations to see if they work!