<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Consider the following volume enclosed by a surface we will call .
Now we will embed in a vector field:
We will cut the the object into two volumes that are enclosed by surfaces we will call and . Again we embed it in the same vectorfield. It is clear that flux through + is equal to flux through This is because the flux through one side of the plane is exactly opposite to theflux through the other side of the plane: So we see that We could subdivide the surface as much as we want and so for subdivisions the integral becomes:
What is .? We can subdivide the volume into a bunch of littlecubes: To first order (which is all that matters since we will take the limit of a smallvolume) the field at a point at the bottom of the box is where we have assumed the middle of the bottom of the box is the point . Through the top of the box you get Through the top and bottom surfaces you get Flux Top - Flux bottom
Which is
Likewise you get the same result in the other dimensionsHence
or
So in the limit that and
This result is intimately connected to the fundamental definition of the divergence which is where the integral is taken over the surface enclosing the volume . The divergence is the flux out of a volume, per unit volume, in the limit ofan infinitely small volume. By our proof of Gauss' theorem, we have shown that the del operator acting on a vector field captures this definition.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Waves and optics' conversation and receive update notifications?