<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Let be a bounded and closed subset of . Then every sequence of elements of has a subsequence that converges to an element of
Let be a sequence in Since is bounded, we know by [link] that there exists a subsequence of that converges to somenumber Since each belongs to it follows that is a limit point of Finally, because is a closed subset of it then follows that
We have defined the concept of a closed set. Now let's give the definition of an open set.
Let be a subset of A point is called an interior point of if there exists an such that the open disk of radius around is entirely contained in The set of all interior points of is denoted by and we call the interior of
A subset of is called an open subset of if every point of is an interior point of i.e., if
Analogously, let be a subset of A point is called an interior point of if there exists an such that the open interval is entirely contained in Again, we denote the set of all interior points of by and call the interior of
A subset of is called an open subset of if every point of is an interior point of i.e., if
We give next a useful application of the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, or more precisely an application of [link] . This also provides some insight into the structure of open sets.
Let be a closed and bounded subset of and suppose is a subset of an open set Then there exists an such that the neighborhood is contained in That is, every open set containing a closed and bounded set actually contains a neighborhood of
If is just a singleton then this theorem is asserting nothing more than the fact that is in the interior of which it is if is an open set. However, when is an infinite set, then the result is more subtle. We argue by contradiction. Thus, suppose there is no such for which then for each positive integer there must be a point that is not in and a corresponding point such that Otherwise, the number would satisfy the claim of the theorem. Now, because the 's all belong to we know from [link] that a subsequence of the sequence must converge to a number Next, we see that
and this quantity tends to 0. Hence, the subsequence of the sequence also converges to
Finally, because belongs to and hence to the open set we know that there must exist an such that the entire disk Then, since the subsequence converges to there must exist a such that implying that and hence belongs to But this is our contradiction, because all of the 's were not in So, the theorem is proved.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?