<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
The NCPEA Handbook of Doctoral Programs in Educational Leadership: Issues and Challenges, Chapter 9, authored by Janice R. Fauske.

I recall my qualitative dissertation study of leadership succession completed in the early 1980s for which the data sources were non-participant observations, interviews, and documents. My advisor and chair was an assistant professor in a department generally open to but not evenly expert in qualitative methodology. Other students warned me to pursue a more concretely manageable and quantitative study, but I, along with two other brave students, chose the seemingly more formidable qualitative journey. We faced perceived and real obstacles related to our choices that the quantitative focused students did not. Selection of committee members was tricky; getting through the Institutional Review Board proved complicated.

Finding similar studies as models for the literature review was daunting. In addition to complications in the processes, the time that full immersion in the data collection and analysis differed from the time that the quantitative studies took. Much of their conceptualization and theoretical structure was in place before data collection began while our sensitizing framework was still emerging, and we were still immersed (sometimes it felt like more like wallowing) in the data with“sensitizing frameworks”that guided our data collection without limiting constant comparative possibilities. Although we experienced the dissertation journey differently than many of those students who pursued quantitative studies, we maintained our energy and focus with mutual support and the sustaining belief that we were pioneers forging the way for qualitative studies in education leadership.

Indeed many qualitative studies in the field have followed, and acceptance of qualitative papers for presentation and publication has definitely increased in the 1990s (Hausman, 2001). Yet when chairing dissertation committees in the late nineties, I found the qualitative dissertation study in many ways still hazy and elusive to both students and professors alike. I wondered why this haziness persisted and began to systematically explore the methodological context of academe as well as the perceptions that shape and inform chairing as well as writing the qualitative dissertation. Given the long history of qualitative research in the social sciences, one would assume that the pursuit of a qualitative dissertation study has become commonplace. Why did I sense that shallow understandings of qualitative inquiry as well as a lack of shared language persist? I attribute this phenomenon in part to the iterative nature of qualitative method and misleading perceptions about effort and rigor among students and faculty. Also, the consistent use of the traditional language of quantitative investigation seemed to further confound full acceptance and embrace of qualitative dissertations.

To explicate and make transparent these hazy elements of qualitative dissertations, I review the current socio-political context of academe and how certain trends in research foci and methodology influence the work of scholars. I also reflect on and synthesize my own experience as a qualitative researcher and dissertation advisor with experiences of others through a review of the literature on writing qualitative studies and dissertations. Those experiences explain the“author’s path”or story (Boyatzis, 1998, p. xiv) and“way of seeing”themes in the experience over time (p.1). Vignettes of my experiences illustrate that story, indicated by italics with names and specifics altered for confidentiality. My experiences are compared to what others have learned, offering implications and suggestions for negotiating the hazy“fog”that can surround the qualitative dissertation process.

Questions & Answers

what is defense mechanism
Chinaza Reply
what is defense mechanisms
Chinaza
I'm interested in biological psychology and cognitive psychology
Tanya Reply
what does preconceived mean
sammie Reply
physiological Psychology
Nwosu Reply
How can I develope my cognitive domain
Amanyire Reply
why is communication effective
Dakolo Reply
Communication is effective because it allows individuals to share ideas, thoughts, and information with others.
effective communication can lead to improved outcomes in various settings, including personal relationships, business environments, and educational settings. By communicating effectively, individuals can negotiate effectively, solve problems collaboratively, and work towards common goals.
it starts up serve and return practice/assessments.it helps find voice talking therapy also assessments through relaxed conversation.
miss
Every time someone flushes a toilet in the apartment building, the person begins to jumb back automatically after hearing the flush, before the water temperature changes. Identify the types of learning, if it is classical conditioning identify the NS, UCS, CS and CR. If it is operant conditioning, identify the type of consequence positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or punishment
Wekolamo Reply
please i need answer
Wekolamo
because it helps many people around the world to understand how to interact with other people and understand them well, for example at work (job).
Manix Reply
Agreed 👍 There are many parts of our brains and behaviors, we really need to get to know. Blessings for everyone and happy Sunday!
ARC
A child is a member of community not society elucidate ?
JESSY Reply
Isn't practices worldwide, be it psychology, be it science. isn't much just a false belief of control over something the mind cannot truly comprehend?
Simon Reply
compare and contrast skinner's perspective on personality development on freud
namakula Reply
Skinner skipped the whole unconscious phenomenon and rather emphasized on classical conditioning
war
explain how nature and nurture affect the development and later the productivity of an individual.
Amesalu Reply
nature is an hereditary factor while nurture is an environmental factor which constitute an individual personality. so if an individual's parent has a deviant behavior and was also brought up in an deviant environment, observation of the behavior and the inborn trait we make the individual deviant.
Samuel
I am taking this course because I am hoping that I could somehow learn more about my chosen field of interest and due to the fact that being a PsyD really ignites my passion as an individual the more I hope to learn about developing and literally explore the complexity of my critical thinking skills
Zyryn Reply
good👍
Jonathan
and having a good philosophy of the world is like a sandwich and a peanut butter 👍
Jonathan
generally amnesi how long yrs memory loss
Kelu Reply
interpersonal relationships
Abdulfatai Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, The handbook of doctoral programs: issues and challenges. OpenStax CNX. Dec 10, 2007 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10427/1.3
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'The handbook of doctoral programs: issues and challenges' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask