<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

The 1976 and 1998 copyright acts yield a few rules of thumb: any work of art made after 1978 is in copyright forthe life of the author plus seventy years; any work of art that was made before 1978 and never published is copyrighted for the life of the author plus seventy years; any work of art that was publishedbefore 1923 is in the public domain; and many works published between 1923 and 1978 remain in copyright today.

Because of the complex layering of older and more recent copyright statutes, works published in or after 1923have a total copyright term of 95 years; this means that the terminus ante quem for published works to enter the public domainwill remain fixed at 1923 until 2018; in that year it will become a rolling date, so that in 2019 the ante quem year will be 1924; thenext year it will be 1925, and so on.
When the copyright owners of works are hard or impossible to identify and locate, asis the case for the vast majority of works published before 1978, they are referred to as "orphan works." The convolution of these rules and terms, here presented in simplified form, is the resultof the continuing force of the central provisions of the Copyright Act of 1909, which was not fully superseded by the later acts; the1909 law defined copyright in a creative work from the moment of its properly registered publication rather than creation.
For a convenient summary of copyright laws in the U.S., including a helpful chart by Lolly Gasaway of theUniversity of North Carolina, see Bielstein, Permissions , 16-33, esp. 27.

The complexity of U.S. copyright law, and its partial incommensurability with copyright law in other countries,is especially onerous for scholars who publish images of twentieth- and twenty-first-century art. Nevertheless, a gradually expandingdefinition in practice (rather than by law) of the "artistic work" that is protected by copyright has created analogous difficultiesfor scholars who study works of art that have long been in the public domain. Authorized photographers of those works, or theowners for whom they make them, usually claim copyright in those reproductions, with the same temporal extensions granted artistsand their heirs.

Thus, most museums now explicitly or implicitly claim copyright over images of all works in theircollection, whether in the public domain or not. The same copyright ownership is implied by for-profit collections of images of publicdomain works, in digital as well as traditional photographic forms. Such collections include stock image providers geared exclusivelyto commercial applications (such as Corbis , a company founded in 1989 by Bill Gates, which describes itself as a "visual solutionsprovider" of all manner of images, not limited to works of art) and image collections focused on reproductions of works of art forcommercial as well as scholarly applications (such as the Bridgeman Art Library and Art Resource , which present themselves as "archives" or "libraries" of art images, many of which are licensedto these providers by major museums as well as private collectors). For museums and other owners of art in the public domain, grantingnon-exclusive licenses to for-profit art image providers extends the commercial value of works of art in their collections.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Art history and its publications in the electronic age. OpenStax CNX. Sep 20, 2006 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10376/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Art history and its publications in the electronic age' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask