<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
We view an observation of the system as a composite trial. Each ω yields a sequence of states which is referred to as a realization of the sequence, or a trajectory . We suppose the system is evolving in time. At discrete instants of time the system makes a transition from one state to the succeeding one (which may be the same).
Initial period: | , | state is ; at t 1 the transition is to |
Period one: | , | state is ; at t 2 the transition is to |
..... | ||
Period k : | , | state is ; at move to |
..... |
The parameter n indicates the period t . If the periods are of unit length, then . At , there is a transition from the state to the state for the next period. To simplify writing, we adopt the following convention:
The random vector U n is called the past at n of the sequence X N and U n is the future at n . In order to capture the notion that the system is without memory, so thatthe future is affected by the present, but not by how the present is reached, we utilize the notion of conditional independence, given a random vector, in the following
Definition . The sequence X N is Markov iff
Several conditions equivalent to the Markov condition (M) may be obtained with the aid of properties of conditional independence. We note first that (M) is equivalent to
The state in the next period is conditioned by the past only through the present state, and not by the manner in which the present state is reached.The statistics of the process are determined by the initial state probabilities and the transition probabilities
The following examples exhibit a pattern which implies the Markov condition and which can be exploited to obtain the transitionprobabilities.
An object starts at a given initial position. At discrete instants the object moves a random distance along a line. The various moves are independent of each other. Let
We note that . Since the position after the transition at is affected by the past only by the value of the position X n and not by the sequence of positions which led to this position, it is reasonable to suppose that the process X N is Markov. We verify this below.
Each member of a population is able to reproduce. For simplicity, we suppose that at certain discrete instants the entire next generationis produced. Some mechanism limits each generation to a maximum population of M members. Let
The population in generation is given by
We suppose the class is iid. Let . Then is independent. It seems reasonable to suppose the sequence X N is Markov.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Applied probability' conversation and receive update notifications?