<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
The pair has joint density on the square region bounded by , , , and (see [link] ),
where . Determine .
ANALYTIC SOLUTION
The intersection of the region Q and the square is the set for which and . Reference to the figure shows three regions of integration.
APPROXIMATION
tuappr
Enter matrix [a b]of X-range endpoints [0 2]
Enter matrix [c d]of Y-range endpoints [0 2]
Enter number of X approximation points 200Enter number of Y approximation points 200
Enter expression for joint density ((u<=min(t+1,3-t))&...
(u>=max(1-t,t-1)))/2
Use array operations on X, Y, PX, PY, t, u, and PM = max(t,u)<=1;
G = t.*M + 2*u.*(1 - M); % Z = g(X,Y)EG = total(G.*P) % E[g(X,Y)]
EG = 1.8340 % Theoretical 11/6 = 1.8333[Z,PZ] = csort(G,P); % Distribution for ZEZ = dot(Z,PZ) % E[Z] from distributionEZ = 1.8340
Special forms for expectation
The various special forms related to property (E20a) are often useful. The general result, which we do not need, is usually derived by an argument which employs a generalform of what is known as Fubini's theorem. The special form (E20b)
may be derived from (E20a) by use of integration by parts for Stieltjes integrals. However, we use the relationship between the graph of the distribution function and the graph ofthe quantile function to show the equivalence of (E20b) and (E20f) . The latter property is readily established by elementary arguments.
If Q is the quantile function for the distribution function F X , then
VERIFICATION
If , where uniform on , then Y has the same distribution as X . Hence,
In reliability, if X is the life duration (time to failure) for a device, the reliability function is the probability at any time t the device is still operative. Thus
According to property (E20b)
Suppose . Then .
The same result could be obtained by using and evaluating .
For the special case , Figure 3(a) shows is the difference in the shaded areas
The corresponding graph of the distribution function F is shown in Figure 3(b) . Because of the construction, the areas of the regions marked A and B are the same in the two figures. As may be seen,
Use of the unit step function for and 0 for (defined arbitrarily at ) enables us to combine the two expressions to get
Property (E20c) is a direct result of linearity and (E20b) , with the unit step functions cancelling out.
Suppose . Then
VERIFICATION
For , by (E20b)
Since F can have only a countable number of jumps on any interval and and differ only at jump points, we may assert
For each nonnegative integer n , let . By the countable additivity of expectation
Since is decreasing with t and each E n has unit length, we have by the mean value theorem
The third inequality follows from the fact that
Remark . Property (E20d) is used primarily for theoretical purposes. The special case (E20e) is more frequently used.
If X is nonnegative, integer valued, then
VERIFICATION
The result follows as a special case of (E20d) . For integer valued random variables,
An elementary derivation of (E20e) can be constructed as follows.
By definition
Now for each finite n ,
Taking limits as yields the desired result.
Suppose geometric . Then . Use of (E20e) gives
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Applied probability' conversation and receive update notifications?