<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Suppose , , , , and are matrices. Solve the following equation for .
That is the solution. Note that solving this uses both the definition of an inverse matrix ( ) and the definition of the identity matrix ( ). Note also that it matters which side you multiply on: would not be correct.
Incidentally, it may help to think of this in analogy to numerical equations. Suppose I gave you the equation:
You might say “I would divide both sides by 3.” But what if I told you there is no such thing as division, only multiplication? Hopefully you would say “No problem, I will multiply both sides by .” You multiply both sides by the inverse of 3 because times 3 is 1, and 1 times is , so the makes the 3 go away. Multiplying by to get rid of is exactly like that.
Here are two equations and two unknowns.
a. Rewrite this problem as a matrix equation.
=
(*I urge you to confirm this for yourself. Multiply the two matrices on the left, then set the resulting matrix equal to the matrix on the right, and confirm that you get the two equations we started with.)
b. Solve. What are and ?
If you think of that previous equation as , then it solves out as . So you can type the first matrix into your calculator as and the second as , then type and you get...
an error! Singular matrix! What happened? I can answer that question on two levels.
First, matrix , thus defined, has a determinant of 0. (You can confirm this easily, with or without the calculator.) Hence, it has no inverse.
Second, these two equations are actually the same equation—as you can see if you multiply the bottom equation by –2. They cannot be solved, because they have an infinite number of solutions.
Solve the following equations for , , , and .
This is where you really, really need a calculator. Again, think of this as , where...
, , and
Then the solution is , which comes out on the calculator:
Since this equals the I defined earlier, that means , , , and .
It’s that easy...and it’s also very, very dangerous. Because if you make one tiny little mistake (such as not noticing the “0 ” in the third equation, or mistyping one little number on the calculator), you get a completely wrong answer, and no credit. So what can you do about this? Here are a few tips.
3.345 STO → A
to put that number into memory
(numerical memory, not matrix memory: the green letters, remember?). Do the same for
,
, and
. Then type:
2A+3B–5D+7D
and make sure you get approximately 8; and so on for the other three equations. If they all work, you know you got it right!
a. Find the determinant.
b. Find the determinant by plugging the appropriate value for into your answer to part (a). Show your work!
xxxNote that since we are using 6 where we had 2n before, n=3. 8-10(3)=–22.
c. Find the determinant on your calculator. Did it come out as you expected?
Hopefully it does. If it doesn’t, don’t say it did—find your mistake!
a. Find the determinant.
I’m not going to do the whole drawing of the “expansion by minors” here, but you can find just such a drawing in your book. But if you do it right, you end up with:
b. Check your answer by finding the determinant of that same matrix when on your calculator. Does it come out the way your equation predicted? Show your work!
Our solution above predicts an answer of . Once again, try it on the calculator: if you don’t get that, find your mistake!
Find the determinant
Strictly a calculator problem: just be careful, and make sure to dump out the matrix to make sure you typed it right. Note that you will have to scroll to the right to see the whole thing! I get 168,555.6667, or 168,555⅔.
Write a 2×2 matrix that has no inverse. No two of the four numbers should be the same.
The key here is knowing that there is no inverse when the determinant, , is zero. So there are many possible solutions, such as:
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Advanced algebra ii: activities and homework' conversation and receive update notifications?