An ordered field satisfies the familiar laws of inequalities. They are consequences of the two properties of the set
Using the positivity properties above for an ordered field
together with the axioms for a field, derive the familiar laws of inequalities:
- (Transitivity) If
and
then
- (Adding like inequalities) If
and
then
- If
and
then
- If
and
then
- If
and
then
- Verify parts (a) through (e) with
replaced by
- If
and
are elements of
show that one and only one of the following three relations can hold: (i)
(ii)
(iii)
- Suppose
and
are elements of
and assume that
and
Prove that
- If
is an ordered field, show that
i.e., that
HINT: By the law of tricotomy,
only one of the three possibilities holds for
Rule out the last two.
- Show that
of
[link] is not an ordered field; i.e., there is no subset
such that the two positivity properties can hold.
HINT: Use part (a) and positivity property (1).
- Prove that
is an ordered field,
where the set
is taken to be the usual set of positive rational numbers.
That is,
consists of those rational numbers
for which both
and
are natural numbers.
- Suppose
is an ordered field and that
is a nonzero element of
Show that for all natural numbers
- (e) Show that, in an ordered field, every nonzero square is positive;
i.e., if
then
We remarked earlier that there are many different examples of fields,
and many of these are also ordered fields.Some fields, though technically different from each other, are really
indistinguishable from the algebraic point of view, andwe make this mathematically precise with the following definition.
-
Let
and
be two ordered fields,
and write
and
for the set of positive elements in
and
respectively. A 1-1 correspondence
between
and
is called an
isomorphism if
-
for all
-
for all
-
if and only if
REMARK. In general, if
and
are two algebraic systems, then a 1-1 correspondence between
and
is called an
isomorphism if it converts the algebraic structure on
into the
corresponding algebraic structure on
- Let
be an ordered field. Define a function
by
Prove that
is an isomorphism of
onto a subset
of
That is, show that this correspondence is one-to-one
and converts addition and multiplicationin
into addition and multiplication in
Give an example to show that this result is not true
if
is merely a field and not an ordered field.
- Let
be an ordered field.
Define a function
by
Prove that
is an isomorphism of the ordered field
onto a subset
of the ordered field
Conclude that every ordered field
contains a subset
that is isomorphic to the ordered field
REMARK. Part (b) of
[link] shows that the ordered
field
is the smallest possible ordered field, in the sense that every other ordered field contains an isomorphic copy of
However, as mentioned earlier, the ordered field
cannot suffice as the set of real numbers. There is no rational number whose square is 2, and we want the square root of 2 to be a real number. See
[link] below. What extra property is there about an ordered field
that will allow us to prove that numbers like
and so on are elements of
It turns out that the extra property we need is related to a quite subtle point concerning upper and lower bounds of sets. It gives us some initial indication that the known-to-be subtle concept of a
limit may be fundamental to our very notion of what the real numbers are.