In this module, we unravel the story contained in "The Egyptian Red Book," which uses cartoons and quotations from authorities to criticize the British government's handling of General Charles Gordon while under siege in Khartoum in 1884-1885. We discuss research methods used by historians, including examining the original source for key details; identifying significant words to use in catalog and index searches; using newspapers, political papers, and other primary source materials; and comparing multiple sources to get the fullest understanding of events.
The story
The Egyptian Red Book, which is
collected in the
Travelers in the Middle East Archive
(TIMEA) , serves as a kind of supplement to the sad story of the demise of
General Charles Gordon in Khartoum, Sudan in 1885. The "Red Book" brings togethersatirical cartoons with a chronological presentation of quotations--primarily from
debates in the British Parliament, but also articles from newspapers, letters anddispatches from the field and other related materials. The work is in effect a case
against Britain's Gladstone Government, which, in the opinion of the authors, failed toprovide Gordon with adequate support in the task he was sent to perform as military
officer in Sudan.* In this module, we will explore how to uncover the full story behindseemingly mysterious document. Before we begin with our analysis of some divergent
accounts of these historical events, we would like to provide you with the basic storyso that our discussion of how to perform historical research will make more sense.
*We would like to note here that our spelling of Sudan differs from
that used by the publishers of the Egyptian Red Book. Their use of "Soudan" seems tohave been derived from the nineteenth-century French spelling of the word.
Historical background
In the 1820's, Egyptian and British forces invaded Sudan, the African
region lying just south of Egypt, designating it a subject state of Egypt. By themid-nineteennth- century, the British interest in Sudan had increased markedly due
to its strategic location for their trade routes to India and the threat of agrowing French influence in Africa. The combination of increasing Egyptian and
European control over Sudan sparked the emergence in 1882 of a man known as theMahdi, meaning "the expected one" in local tradition. The Mahdi, a man named
Mohammad Ahmed, was expected to liberate the Islamic world from the oppression offoreign occupation. Ahmed called upon all of the true believers of Islam to stand up
and resist foreign oppression, who then rose up and engaged the local authoritiesthroughout the region. Although the British had not officially colonized Egypt or
taken possession of the region, they were in occupation of it and all but controlledthe Egyptian government at this time. Bloody battles ensued and the Mahdi was
victorious against both the British and Egyptian armies sent to defeat him. In lightof their failures, British and Egyptian officials decided to abandon the region and
evacuate the remaining civilians living there. In January of 1884, General Gordonwas assigned this task and sent to the city of Khartoum for the purpose of
facilitating the evacuation of some fifteen-thousand Egyptians and Europeansremaining in, but wishing to leave, the region of Sudan.
Receive real-time job alerts and never miss the right job again
Source:
OpenStax, Studying political satire: "the egyptian red book". OpenStax CNX. Sep 19, 2006 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10290/1.6
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Studying political satire: "the egyptian red book"' conversation and receive update notifications?