<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Conclusion
The scope of this chapter has not identified all of the experiences involved in creating a new doctoral program in educational leadership. Yet the process of reflecting on our experiences in these 2 years has exposed many of the issues that have challenged us during this time. While faculty members involved with this doctoral program have not yet found solutions for all of the challenges identified that included admissions, the changing cultural climate, curriculum and instruction, the need for collaboration and others, there is considerable ongoing dialogue. We are talking with faculty at other universities, we are listening to our students and their ideas about on-going program improvement, and we are researching the literature to find other possible ideas and strategies that will result in a successful educational leadership program. The process of change is alive and well, even in a brand new program. In our new educational leadership doctoral program at Lamar University, the process of reflection focuses not on re-vitalizing an existing program but instead on the ongoing process of continually refining to build a strong program for leaders.
References
Alford, B. J., Gill, P., Marshall, R., Crocker,&Spall, S. (1999). Case study of educational leadership program renewal: A vision of preparing the scholar-practitioner leader. Paper presented at The Southwest Educational Research Association Conference, January, 1999 in San Antonio, Texas.
Anderson, G. L.,&Saavedra, E. (2003). School-based reform, leadership, and practitioner research: Mapping the terrain. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 1(1), 23-38.
Bredeson, P. (2006, summer). Integrated doctoral programs in educational leadership: The case for preparing practitioners and researchers together. UCEA Review, 20-23.
Creighton, T.,&Jones, G. D. (2001). Selection or self-selection? How rigorous are our selection criteria for educational administration programs. Paper presented at the annual Conference of National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA). August, 2001 in Houston, Texas.
Creighton, T.,&Parks, D. (2006). Effective mentoring of doctoral students: A pedagogy. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA), August 2, 2006 in Lexington, Kentucky.
Cresswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Donmoyer, R., Imber, J.,&Scheurich, J. J. (Eds.). (1995). The knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives. Albany, NY: The State University of New York Press.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Harris, S. (Ed.). (2005). Changing mindsets of educational leaders to improve schools: Voices of doctoral students. Lanham, MD: Rowman&Littlefield Education.
Hart, A. W.,&Pounder, D. (1999). Reinventing preparation programs: A decade of activity. In J. Murphy&P. Forsyth (Eds.). Educational Administration. A decade of reform, (pp. 115-151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Irby, B.,&Lunenburg, F. (2006). Doctoral program issues: Accreditation of programs. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA), August 2, 2006 in Lexington, Kentucky.
Jackson, B. L.,&Kelley, C. (2001, September 19-21). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Paper commissioned for the first meeting of the National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership Preparation. Racine, Wisconsin, September 19-21, 2001. Retrieved January 4, 2007, from http://www.ncaelp.org
Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. The Educating School Leaders Project. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://www.edschools.org/reports_leaders.htm
Milstein, M. M. (1993). Changing the way we prepare educational leaders: The Danforth programs: What we have learned over the past decade. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(2), 100-116.
Milstein, M. M.,&Krueger, J. A. (1997). Improving Educational Administration Preparation experience. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Milstein, M. M. (2000). The evolution of Educational Leadership programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, XXXV(4), 537-545.
Mullen, C. A. (2005). Fire and ice: Igniting and channeling passion in new qualitative researchers. New York: Peter Lang.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Starratt, R. J. (2004). The dialogue of scholarship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(2), 259-267.
Young, I. P. (2006). The doctoral student procurement and advisement process. Paper presented at the annual Conference of National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, August 2, 2006 in Lexington, Kentucky.
Young, I. P., Galloway, C. M.,&Rinehart, J. (1990). The effects of recruitment brochure content and gender of the reactor for doctoral programs in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 168-182.
Young, M. (2006). From the director: The M.Ed, Ed.D., and Ph.D, in educational leadership. UCEA Review, 6-8.
Young, M., Crow, G., Orr, T., Ogawa, R.,&Creighton, T. (2005). An educative look at“educating school leaders.”Retrieved July 29, 2006, from http://www.ucea.org/pdf/EducLeadersRespMar18.pdf
Author Biography
Sandra Harris, Ph.D. is an associate professor and Director of the Center for Doctoral Studies in Educational Leadership at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas. Dr. Harris primarily specializes in the educational areas of doctoral leadership learning, creating welcoming achieving school climates K-12, and effective practices for leaders K-16. She is editor of the refereed journal NCPEA Education Leadership Review. Her most recent books are Changing Mindsets of Educational Leaders (2005, Rowman&Littlefield Education), Best Practices of Award-Winning Secondary Principals (2006 Corwin Press), and The Challenges of No Child Left Behind (2007, with Jane Irons, Rowman&Littlefield Education).
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'The handbook of doctoral programs: issues and challenges' conversation and receive update notifications?