<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
In recent practice, "digital scholarship" has meant several related things:
It may seem odd to some that creating collections and the tools to use them should be counted asscholarship, but humanities and social science research has always required collections of appropriate information, and throughouthistory, scholars have often been the ones to assemble those collections, as part of their scholarship. Moreover, scholars havebeen building tools since the first index, the first concordance, the first scholarly edition. So, while it is reasonable to regard(d) as the core meaning and ultimate objective of “digital scholarship,” it is also important to recognize that in the earlydigital era, leadership may well consist of collection-building or tool-building. In addition, tool-building is dependent on theexistence of collections, and both collections and tools get better and more general as there is more use of digital information. If wehope to see new intellectual products, we should give high priority to building tools and collections. Finally, it is worth noting thatalthough (a), (b), (c), and (e) require a great deal of cooperation, it is still imaginable that (d) can be the work of asingle individual.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the '"our cultural commonwealth" the report of the american council of learned societies commission on cyberinfrastructure for the humanities and social sciences' conversation and receive update notifications?