<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

As a consequence of the structure of y, it is easy to see that it can be compressed with the following redundancy,

r | T | ( r - 1 ) 2 log ( n | T | + O ( 1 ) ) + | T | log ( n ) ,

where the new | T | log ( n ) term arises from coding the locations of transitions between segments (states of the tree) in the BWT output. Not only is the BWT convenient for compression, but it is amenable to fast computation. Both the BWT and its inverse can be implemented in O ( n ) time. This combination of great compression and speed has made the BWT quite popular in compressors that have appeared since the late 1990s. For example, the bzip2 archiving package is very popular among network administrators.

That said, from a theoretical perspective the BWT suffers from an extraneous redundancy of | T | log ( n ) bits. Until this gap was resolved, the theoretical community still preferred the semi-predictive method or another approach based on mixtures.

Semi-predictive coding using the bwt

Another approach for using the BWT is to use y only for learning the MDL tree source T * . To do so, note that when the BWT is run, it is possible to track the correspondences between contexts and segments of the BWT output. Therefore, information about per-segment symbol count is available, and can be easily applied to perform the tree pruning procedure that we have seen. Not only that, but some BWT computation algorithms (e.g., suffix tree approaches) maintain this information for all context depths and not just bounded D . In short, the BWT allows to compute the minimizing tree T * in linear time  [link] .

Given the minimizing tree T * , it is not obvious how to determine which state generated each character of y (respectively, x ) in linear time. It has been shown by Martín et al.  [link] that this step can also be performed in linear time by developing a state machine whose states include the leaves of T * . The result is a two part code, where the first part computes the optimal T * via BWT, and the second part actually compresses x by tracking which state of T * generated each of the symbols. To summarize, we have a linear complexity algorithm for compressing and decompressing a source while achieving the redundancy bounds for the class of tree sources.

Context tree weighting

We discussed in [link] for the problem of encoding a transition between two known i.i.d. distributions that

1 n i = 1 n p θ i ( x ) > 1 n max i { p θ i ( x ) } .

Therefore, a mixture over all parameter values yields a greater probability (and thus lower coding length) than the maximizing approach. Keep in mind that finding the optimal MDL tree source T * is analogous to the plug-in approach, and it would reduce the coding length if we could assign the probability as a mixture over all possible trees, where we assign trees with fewer leaves a greater weight. That is, ideally we want to implement

Pr ( x ) = T 2 - | code ( T ) | · p T ( x ) ,

where | code ( T ) | is the length of the encoding procedure that we discussed for the tree structure T , and p T ( x ) is the probability for the sequence x under the model T .

Willems et al. showed how to implement such a mixture in a simple way over the class of tree sources of bounded depth D . As before, the algorithm proceeds in a bottom up manner from leaves toward the root. At leaves, the probability p s assigned to symbols that were generated within that context s is the Krichevsky-Trofimov probability, p K T ( s , x )   [link] . For s that is an internal node whose depth is less than D , the approach by Willems et al.  [link] is to mix ( i ) the probabilities of keeping the branches for 0s and 1s and ( ii ) pruning,

p s = 1 2 p K T ( s , x ) + 1 2 p 0 s · p 1 s .

It can be shown that this simple formula allows to implement a mixture over the class of bounded depth context tree sources, thus reducing the coding length w.r.t. the semi-predictive approach.

In fact, Willems later showed how to extend the context tree weighting (CTW) approach to tree sources of unbounded depth  [link] . Unfortunately, while the basic bounded depth CTW has complexity that is comparable to the BWT, the unboundedCTW has potentially higher complexity.

Questions & Answers

A golfer on a fairway is 70 m away from the green, which sits below the level of the fairway by 20 m. If the golfer hits the ball at an angle of 40° with an initial speed of 20 m/s, how close to the green does she come?
Aislinn Reply
cm
tijani
what is titration
John Reply
what is physics
Siyaka Reply
A mouse of mass 200 g falls 100 m down a vertical mine shaft and lands at the bottom with a speed of 8.0 m/s. During its fall, how much work is done on the mouse by air resistance
Jude Reply
Can you compute that for me. Ty
Jude
what is the dimension formula of energy?
David Reply
what is viscosity?
David
what is inorganic
emma Reply
what is chemistry
Youesf Reply
what is inorganic
emma
Chemistry is a branch of science that deals with the study of matter,it composition,it structure and the changes it undergoes
Adjei
please, I'm a physics student and I need help in physics
Adjanou
chemistry could also be understood like the sexual attraction/repulsion of the male and female elements. the reaction varies depending on the energy differences of each given gender. + masculine -female.
Pedro
A ball is thrown straight up.it passes a 2.0m high window 7.50 m off the ground on it path up and takes 1.30 s to go past the window.what was the ball initial velocity
Krampah Reply
2. A sled plus passenger with total mass 50 kg is pulled 20 m across the snow (0.20) at constant velocity by a force directed 25° above the horizontal. Calculate (a) the work of the applied force, (b) the work of friction, and (c) the total work.
Sahid Reply
you have been hired as an espert witness in a court case involving an automobile accident. the accident involved car A of mass 1500kg which crashed into stationary car B of mass 1100kg. the driver of car A applied his brakes 15 m before he skidded and crashed into car B. after the collision, car A s
Samuel Reply
can someone explain to me, an ignorant high school student, why the trend of the graph doesn't follow the fact that the higher frequency a sound wave is, the more power it is, hence, making me think the phons output would follow this general trend?
Joseph Reply
Nevermind i just realied that the graph is the phons output for a person with normal hearing and not just the phons output of the sound waves power, I should read the entire thing next time
Joseph
Follow up question, does anyone know where I can find a graph that accuretly depicts the actual relative "power" output of sound over its frequency instead of just humans hearing
Joseph
"Generation of electrical energy from sound energy | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore" ***ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7150687?reload=true
Ryan
what's motion
Maurice Reply
what are the types of wave
Maurice
answer
Magreth
progressive wave
Magreth
hello friend how are you
Muhammad Reply
fine, how about you?
Mohammed
hi
Mujahid
A string is 3.00 m long with a mass of 5.00 g. The string is held taut with a tension of 500.00 N applied to the string. A pulse is sent down the string. How long does it take the pulse to travel the 3.00 m of the string?
yasuo Reply
Who can show me the full solution in this problem?
Reofrir Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Universal algorithms in signal processing and communications. OpenStax CNX. May 16, 2013 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11524/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Universal algorithms in signal processing and communications' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask