<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

There are greater differences in what the administrators and teachers perceived as occurring in practice. Table 2 provides a rank order of how administrators and teachers see the ELCC standards being practiced.

Teachers’ and administrators’ ranking of elcc standards in practice
Mean Teachers Rank Teachers Mean Administrators Rank Administrators
Vision 3.29 4 3.00 4
Instructional Leadership 2.61 1 2.38 1*
Management 3.03 2 3.25 3
Community Relations 3.99 5 5.00 5*
Ethical Leadership 3.19 3 2.38 2*
Professional Involvement 4.12 6 5.00 6*

*Determined by frequency distribution

Teachers view administrators as placing the highest priority on instructional leadership. Management is perceived by teachers as the second highest standard practiced and ethical leadership third. Administrators perceive that instructional leadership is the highest priority; however, administrators perceive ethical leadership as the second highest standard practiced and management third.

Perceptions by gender are reported in Table 3 for teachers differing in gender. The differences in perceptions between male teachers and female teachers are analyzed using a Mann Whitney U Test. Female teachers perceive administrators as placing a higher priority on the practice of management (M=2.80, p= .041). Male teachers perceive administrators as demonstrating more ethical leadership (M=2.56, p= .003).

Perceptions of elcc standards in practice ranked by gender
n Mean Rank Sum of Ranks Mann-Whitney U p
Vision          
Male 42 3.18 2787    
        1841 0.72
Female 89 3.28 5991    
           
Instructional Leadership          
Male 42 2.35 2880.5    
        1734.5 0.791
        1734.5 0.791
Female 89 2.69 6097.5    
Management          
Male 42 3.46 3275    
      2329 0.041*
Female 89 2.88 5503    
Community Relations          
Male 42 4.28 2355    
        2148.5 0.242
Female 89 3.92 6423    
Ethical Leadership          
Male 42 2.56 3298    
      1409 0.013*
Female 89 3.39 5480    
Professional Involvement          
Male 42 4.67 3094.5    
      2352 0.026
Female 89 3.91 5683.5    

*P>.05

Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance is calculated to determine the equality of the medians for the ranked ELLC standards by years of experience and by education level. The actual years of teaching experience is reported by each of the respondents. After frequencies for years of experience are calculated, respondents are divided into three groups; nine years of teaching experience or less, 10-19 years of teaching experiences, and 20 years or more of teaching experience. Respondents also reported their level of education by choosing one of the following items: BA, MA, EdS, or EdD. The number of respondents who reported having an EdS degree or EdD degree is low, so these two groups are combined for purposes of analyses. The dependent variable for the Kruskal-Willis analysis is the respondents’ ranking of the importance of the ELLC standards. The independent variables for the Kursal-Willis analysis are the years of experience and the educational level.

When considering years of educational experiences, there is one significant difference. Educators with 10 - 19 years of experience rank instructional leadership higher than educators with 9 or less years of experience, and significantly higher than those educators with 20 or more years of experience. Table 4 provides a summary of the mean rank of the perceived importance of the standards when considered by years of educational experience.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Ncpea education leadership review, volume 10, number 2; august 2009. OpenStax CNX. Feb 22, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10710/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Ncpea education leadership review, volume 10, number 2; august 2009' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask