-
Home
- A unified theory of a law
- A unified theory of a law
- An application of the theory:
Deregulation
Deregulation is one of the three permutations of a law.
Let us look at the
OPINIONS of the Lawmaker engaged in deregulation.
The two opinions that pair up in the head of a Lawmaker engaged in deregulation are
- a lack of a desire for killing
(the affirmative conduct) .
- a lack of a desire for not killing
(the negative conduct) and
In deregulation, a Lawmaker lacks a desire with regard to both polarities of conduct. On or off, a Lawmaker does not have a preference. A Lawmaker does not desire killing and does not desire not killing.
(a broad focus) . A Lawmaker lacks a desire for the Source to kill and lacks a desire for the Source to not kill.
(a narrow focus on the Source) . A Lawmaker lacks a desire for the Recipient to be killed and lacks a desire for the Recipient to be not killed
(a narrow focus on the Recipient) . The Lawmaker is neutral, indifferent and ambivalent. Killing or not killing, it makes no difference.
Let us look at the
VEHICLES a Lawmaker uses to convey the opinions.
In deregulation, a Lawmaker issues a permission to kill or to not kill
(a broad focus) . The permission takes the form of
Thou may kill or not kill . The word, 'may', is the clue to deregulation. A Lawmaker binds to the Source a privilege (a no-duty) to kill or not to kill
(a narrow focus on the Source) . The Lawmaker binds to the Recipient a no-right to be killed or not to be killed
(a narrow focus on the Recipient) .
Let us look at
METAPHORS applicable to negative regulation.
In deregulation, a Lawmaker does not take her hands and grab conduct in an attempt to manipulate its flow from a Source to a Recipient through circumstances. The Lawmaker leaves it alone.
(a broad focus) . The "hands off" Lawmaker does not push either affirmative or negative conduct from the Source.
(a narrow focus on the Source) . A "hands off" Lawmaker does not pull either affirmative or negative conduct to the Recipient
(a narrow focus on the Recipient) .
Affirmative regulation
Affirmative Regulation is one of the three permutations of a law.
Let us look at the
OPINIONS of the Lawmaker engaged in affirmative regulation.
The two opinions that pair up in the head of a Lawmaker engaged in affirmative regulation are
- a desire for killing
(the affirmative conduct) and
- a lack of desire for not killing
(the negative conduct) .
In affirmative regulation, a Lawmaker wants the polarity of the flow of killing to be on
(a broad focus) . A Lawmaker wants the Source to kill
(a narrow focus on the Source) . A Lawmaker wants the Recipient to be killed
(a narrow focus on the Recipient) .
Let us look at the
VEHICLES a Lawmaker uses to convey the opinions.
In affirmative regulation, a Lawmaker issues a command to kill
(a broad focus) . The command takes the form of
Thou shall kill . The word, 'shall', is the clue to regulation. A Lawmaker binds to the Source a duty to kill
(a narrow focus on the Source) . The Lawmaker binds to the Recipient a right to be killed
(a narrow focus on the Recipient) .
Let us look at
METAPHORS applicable to affirmative regulation.
In affirmative regulation, a Lawmaker takes her hands and grabs onto conduct in an attempt to manipulate its flow from a Source to a Recipient through circumstances.
(a broad focus) . The "hands on" Lawmaker pushes the affirmative conduct from the Source
(a narrow focus on the Source) and pulls the affirmative conduct to the Recipient
(a narrow focus on the Recipient) .
Source:
OpenStax, A unified theory of a law. OpenStax CNX. Mar 25, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10670/1.106
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.
