0.15 Denoising ii: adapting to unknown smoothness  (Page 20/2)

Review: denoising in smooth function spaces i - method of sieves

Suppose we make noisy measurements of a smooth function:

where

and

The unknown function $f^{*}$ is a map

In Lecture 4 , we consider this problem in the case where $f^{*}$ was Lipschitz on $[0,1].$ That is, $f^{*}$ satisfied

where $L>0$ is a constant. In that case, we showed that by using a piecewise constant function on a partition of $n^{\frac{1}{3}}$ equal-size bins [link] we were able to obtain an estimator ${\widehat{f}}_n$ whose mean square error was

In this lecture we will use the Maximum Complexity-Regularized Likelihood Estimation result we derived in Lecture 14 to extend our denoising scheme in several important ways.

To begin with let's consider a broader class of functions.

Hölder spaces

For $0<\alpha <1,$ define the space of functions

for some constant $C_{\alpha }<\infty$ and where $f\in L_{\infty }.$ $H^{\alpha }$ above contains functions that are bounded, but less smooth than Lipschitz functions. Indeed, the space of Lipschitzfunctions can be defined as $H^1$ ( $\alpha =1$ )

for $C_1<\infty .$ Functions in $H^1$ are continuous, but those in $H^{\alpha },\alpha <1,$ are not in general.

Let's also consider functions that are smoother than Lipschitz. If $\alpha =1+\beta ,$ where $0<\beta <1,$ then define

In other words, $H^{\alpha },1<\alpha <2,$ contains Lipschitz functions that are also differentiable and their derivatives are Hölder smooth with smoothness $\beta =\alpha -1.$

And finally, let

contain functions that have continuous derivatives, but that are notnecessarily twice-differentiable.

If $f\in H^{\alpha }\left(C_{\alpha }\right)$ , $0<\alpha \le 2,$ then we say that $f$ is Hölder $-\alpha$ smooth with Hölder constant $C_{\alpha }.$ The notion of Hölder smoothness can also be extended to $\alpha >2$ in a straightforward way.

Note: If ${\alpha }_1<{\alpha }_2$ then

Summarizing, we can describe Hölder spaces as follows. If $f^{*}\in H^{\alpha }\left(C_{\alpha }\right)$ for some $0<\alpha \le 2$ and $C_{\alpha }<\infty ,$ then

• (i) $0<\alpha \le 1$                    $|f^{*}\left(t\right)-f^{*}\left(s\right)|\le C_{\alpha }{|t-s|}^{\alpha }$
• (ii) $1<\alpha \le 2$                    $\left|\frac{\partial f^{*}}{\partial x},\left(t\right),-,\frac{\partial f^{*}}{\partial x},\left(s\right)\right|\le C_{\alpha }{|t-s|}^{\alpha -1}$

Note that in general there is a natural relationship between the Hölder space containing the function and the approximation classused to estimate the function. Here we will consider functions which are Hölder $-\alpha$ smooth where $0<\alpha \le 2$ and work with piecewise linear approximations. If we were to consider smootherfunctions, $\alpha >2$ we would need consider higher order approximation functions, i.e. quadratic, cubic, etc.

Denoising example for signal-plus-gaussian noise observation model

Now let's assume $f^{*}\in H^{\alpha }\left(C_{\alpha }\right)$ for some unknown $\alpha (0<\alpha \le 2)$ ; i.e. we don't know how smooth $f^{*}$ is. We will use our observations

to construct an estimator ${\widehat{f}}_n.$ Intuitively, the smoother $f^{*}$ is, the better we should be able to estimate it. Can we take advantage ofextra smoothness in $f^{*}$ if we don't know how smooth it is? The smoother $f^{*}$ is, the more averaging we can perform to reduce noise. In other words for smoother $f^{*}$ we should average over larger bins. Also, we will need to exploit the extra smoothnessin our approximation of $f^{*}.$ To that end, we will consider candidate functions that are piecewiselinear functions on uniform partitions of $[0,1].$ Let