<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Title III requires the president to establish a President’s Committee on Science and Technology (PCST), charged with conducting an extensive science, engineering and technology survey.

Without a doubt, the OSTP act is the most far-sighted, comprehensive statement of national science policy goals and principles ever to be enunciated by any branch of the federal government. But there is also little doubt that the attempt to legislate a national science policy and to define the science advisor’s responsibilities in terms of its implementation undermined both the objectives of requiring the White House to conceptualize science policy in broader terms and assuring effective presidential access to the official designated to advise the president on implementation of the grand strategy.

Although the OSTP Act became law approximately six months prior to the November 1976 presidential election in which Ford would be defeated by Jimmy Carter, Ford gave every indication that he would remain faithful to Congress’ intentions. In July, he nominated Stever as OSTP Director, and Stever moved rapidly during the next five months to implement the provisions of the new act. Philip Smith, who had served as his executive assistant at NSF, moved with Stever to the Executive Office of the President as assistant director of OSTP. The OSTP negotiated contracts with two consulting firms to plan preparation of the first Five-Year Outlook and the first Annual Science and Technology Report to the Congress . The Intergovernmental Science, Engineering, and Technology Advisory Panel (ISETAP), the Federal Coordinating Committee on Science, Engineering, and Technology (FCCSET) were activated, as was the President’s Council on Science and Technology (PCST).

By the end of his term, Ford was beginning to think in strategic terms about linking science and technology investments to national goals Ibid, 212. just as Congress had intended. Ford also took pride in having reversed the downward trend in federal R&D expenditures that had started in 1967. Between fiscal years 1968 and 1975, Federal fiscal years began on July 1 until 1975, after which they began on October 1. total federal R&D expenditures, as measured in constant 1972 dollars, declined from $18.1 billion to $14.5 billion. Science Indicators reports. During the two fiscal years in which the Ford administration presented its budget request to Congress, total R&D investments were $15.1 and $15.4 billion respectively. These upward trends were to continue throughout the subsequent Carter administration, reaching $16.5 billion in fiscal year 1980. Federal expenditures for basic research, which had declined from $2.93 billion in fiscal year 1968 to $2.54 billion in fiscal year 1975, rose to $2.60 billion in fiscal year 1976, $2.72 billion in fiscal year 1977, and to $3.13 billion in fiscal year 1980.

On August 13, 1976, the day after Stever was sworn in as science advisor, Ford nominated Simon Ramo as chairman of PCST. Nine more PCST members were named in October. At the first two committee meetings, responsibilities for each of the thirteen components of the congressionally mandated federal science and technology survey were assigned to the members, and six additional meetings were scheduled for 1977.

On March 16, 1977, the pro forma resignations of all PCST members were accepted by the new Carter administration. Thereafter, PCST and the survey it was supposed to carry out were dead letters, as was the idea that the executive and legislative branches could cooperate closely in implementing a national science policy. This was to be among several early indications that the Carter administration’s implementation of the OSTP Act would be halfhearted at best.

Questions & Answers

what is defense mechanism
Chinaza Reply
what is defense mechanisms
Chinaza
I'm interested in biological psychology and cognitive psychology
Tanya Reply
what does preconceived mean
sammie Reply
physiological Psychology
Nwosu Reply
How can I develope my cognitive domain
Amanyire Reply
why is communication effective
Dakolo Reply
Communication is effective because it allows individuals to share ideas, thoughts, and information with others.
effective communication can lead to improved outcomes in various settings, including personal relationships, business environments, and educational settings. By communicating effectively, individuals can negotiate effectively, solve problems collaboratively, and work towards common goals.
it starts up serve and return practice/assessments.it helps find voice talking therapy also assessments through relaxed conversation.
miss
Every time someone flushes a toilet in the apartment building, the person begins to jumb back automatically after hearing the flush, before the water temperature changes. Identify the types of learning, if it is classical conditioning identify the NS, UCS, CS and CR. If it is operant conditioning, identify the type of consequence positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or punishment
Wekolamo Reply
please i need answer
Wekolamo
because it helps many people around the world to understand how to interact with other people and understand them well, for example at work (job).
Manix Reply
Agreed 👍 There are many parts of our brains and behaviors, we really need to get to know. Blessings for everyone and happy Sunday!
ARC
A child is a member of community not society elucidate ?
JESSY Reply
Isn't practices worldwide, be it psychology, be it science. isn't much just a false belief of control over something the mind cannot truly comprehend?
Simon Reply
compare and contrast skinner's perspective on personality development on freud
namakula Reply
Skinner skipped the whole unconscious phenomenon and rather emphasized on classical conditioning
war
explain how nature and nurture affect the development and later the productivity of an individual.
Amesalu Reply
nature is an hereditary factor while nurture is an environmental factor which constitute an individual personality. so if an individual's parent has a deviant behavior and was also brought up in an deviant environment, observation of the behavior and the inborn trait we make the individual deviant.
Samuel
I am taking this course because I am hoping that I could somehow learn more about my chosen field of interest and due to the fact that being a PsyD really ignites my passion as an individual the more I hope to learn about developing and literally explore the complexity of my critical thinking skills
Zyryn Reply
good👍
Jonathan
and having a good philosophy of the world is like a sandwich and a peanut butter 👍
Jonathan
generally amnesi how long yrs memory loss
Kelu Reply
interpersonal relationships
Abdulfatai Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, A history of federal science policy from the new deal to the present. OpenStax CNX. Jun 26, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11210/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'A history of federal science policy from the new deal to the present' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask