<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
e b + e c = g + h + ω b b | b | + ω c c | c | = f + g + h = 0 .

and

e b × b + e c × c = g + ω b b | b | × b + h + ω c c | c | × = g × b + b × ω b b | b | + h × c + c × ω c c | c | = g × b + h × c = 0

because b is parallel to ω b b | b | (and likewise for c ) and f is balanced. According to Lemma 1, there is a truss R with equilibrating e . Let S be the truss consisting of the collection of beams ( 0 , b ) and ( 0 , c ) with weights ω b and ω c respectively. We claim T = R + S equilibrates f . Let φ be a continuous vector field. Then

δ T = δ R + δ S = e + ω b b | b | ( δ ( b ) - δ ( 0 ) ) + ω c c | c | ( δ ( c ) - δ ( 0 ) ) = g + ω b b | b | δ ( b ) + h + ω c c | c | δ ( c ) + ω b b | b | δ ( b ) + ω c c | c | δ ( c ) - δ ( 0 ) ω b b | b | + ω c c | c | = g δ ( b ) - ω b b | b | δ ( b ) + h δ ( c ) - ω c c | c | δ ( c ) + ω b b | b | δ ( b ) + ω c c | c | δ ( c ) - f δ ( 0 ) = f δ ( a ) + g δ ( b ) + h δ ( c ) = f

which then implies [link] .

The following lemma shows when the volume of the parallelpiped spanned by three vectors can be made to be nonzero by sheering theparallelpiped in a fixed direction by an appropriate amount. An example in two dimensions is drawn below.

Lemma 3 Let a , b , c be distinct, nonzero points in Euclidean space and v a nonzero vector. Then there exists t R such that v Span { a + t v , b + t v , c + t v } .

If ν Span { a , b , c } , then just take t = 0 . If any of the vectors, say a and b , are linearly dependent, then for some constant, n , b = n a . For any nonzero t , a + t ν is linearly independent from b + t ν because b + t ν = a n + t ν is not equal to n ( a + t ν ) = a n + n t ν ) since n t ν t ν because ν and t are nonzero. Applying this argument again to b and c if necessary, we can get three vectors, a + t ν , b + t ν , and c + t ν , which are guaranteed to be linearly independent. Because the span of any three linearly independent vectors is all of R 3 , every vector is contained in Span { a , b , c } , so it must be that ν Span { a , b , c } , as desired.

Combining the above lemmas, we have

Theorem 1 A necessary and sufficient condition that a point force field f = f 1 δ ( a 1 ) + + f ν δ ( a ν ) be balanced is that it is equilibrated by a truss T .

(Necessity) Suppose f is equilibrated by the truss T . Let ν R 3 and φ ( x ) = ν for all x R 3 . Then [link] implies

0 = ( δ T , φ ) = ( f , φ ) = i = 1 μ f i · v = ν · i = 1 μ f i .

because φ is a constant vector field. Since ν was arbitrary, it can be chosen to be

ν = i = 1 μ f i

so that

0 = ν · i = 1 μ f i = i = 1 μ f i 2

and conclude that

i = 1 μ f i = 0

which implies [link] . For w R 3 , define the skew symmetric matrix

w ^ = 0 - w 3 w 2 w 3 0 - w 1 - w 2 w 1 0

It is easy to check that w ^ ν = w × ν . Let ν R 3 and φ ( x ) = x ^ ν . Then

( δ T , φ ) = i = 1 μ ( δ B , φ ) = i = 1 μ ω i ( φ ( a i ) - φ ( b i ) ) · a i - b i | a i - b i | = i = 1 μ ω i ( a ^ i - b ^ i ) ν · a i - b i | a i - b i | = i = 1 μ ω i ( a i - b i ) × ν · a i - b i | a i - b i | = 0 .

because the cross product w i ( a i - b i ) × ν is perpendicular to the vector a i - b i , which is parallel to a i - b i | a i - b i | so their dot product is zero. By [link] , this implies

0 = ( δ T , φ ) = ( f , φ ) = i = 1 μ f i · φ ( a i ) = i = 1 μ f i · a ^ i v = i = 1 μ f i · a i × ν = i = 1 μ f i × a i · ν .

Since ν is arbitrary, we infer [link] . Thus f is balanced.

(Sufficiency) We proceed by induction on ν . If ν = 2 , then f is equilibrated by the truss T guaranteed in Lemma 1. If ν = 3 and a 1 , a 2 and a 3 do not all lie on a line, then f is equilibrated by the truss T guaranteed in Lemma 2. If ν = 3 and a 1 , a 2 and a 3 lie on a line, consider the equivalent point force field g = f 1 δ ( a 1 ) + f 2 δ ( a 2 ) + f 3 δ ( a 3 ) + 0 δ ( a 4 ) where a 4 is a arbitrary point chosen off the line containing a 1 , a 2 and a 3 . The result for ν = 4 proves that g is equilibrated by a truss T . However, since ( g , φ ) = ( f , φ ) for all continuous vector fields φ , this implies that T also equilibrates f . Assume that sufficiency holds for ν 3 . If f ν + 1 = 0 , then we are done. Otherwise, according to Lemma 3, there is ρ R so that

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Michell trusses study, rice u. nsf vigre group, summer 2013. OpenStax CNX. Sep 02, 2013 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11567/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Michell trusses study, rice u. nsf vigre group, summer 2013' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask