<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

It could be surmised that current suburban CSAs, at least in New Jersey, are quite possibly holding school building principals to the same set of standards on their summative evaluations that they themselves were held to when they were site administrators. Since the field of administrator preparation is so focused on the ISLLC standards, understanding how our graduates are going to be evaluated in the field in relation to these standards could quite possibly assist administrator preparation programs to more comprehensively prepare students for the realities of the practice in the real world of work.

References

Amesterdam, C.E., Johnson, R.L., Monrad, D.M., and Tonnsen, S.L. (2005). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17 (3), 221 – 242.

Barnet, D. (2004). School leadership preparation programs: Are they preparing tomorrow’s leaders. Education, 125 (1), Fall 2004.

Catano, N., and Stronge, J.H. (2006). What are principals expected to do? Congruence between principal evaluation and performance standards. National Association ofSecondary School Principals; NASSP Bulletin, 90 (3), 221 – 228.

Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (1996). Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standard for School Leaders. 5-21. Washington, DC: Author.

Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2007). Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008. Adopted by the National Policy Board for EducationalAdministration (NPBEA) on December 12, 2007. Washington, DC: Author.

Crow, G.M. (2006). Complexity and beginning principal in the United States: Perspectives on socialization. Journal of Educational Administration, 44 (4), 310 – 315.

Davis, S.H., and Hensley, P.A. (1999). The politics of principal evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13 (4), 383 – 403.

Dutton, M., Selbee, M., and Schwartz, B. (2006). New requirements for evaluating principals. Source: P.A. 94 – 1039, eff. 7-20-06.

Ediger, M. (2002). Assessing the school principal. Education, 123 (1), Fall 2002, 90 – 95.

Edmunds, M. (2007). The female superintendency: Reframing our understanding of women’s leadership styles and behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seton HallUniversity, South Orange, New Jersey.

Ellett, C.D. (1999). Development in the preparation and licensing of school leaders: The work of the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium. Journal of Personnel Evaluation inEducation, 13 (3), 201 – 204.

Latham, A.S., and Pearlman, M.A. (1999). From standards to licensure: Developing an authentic assessment for school principals. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13 (3),245 – 262.

Lindle, J.C., Stalion, N., and Young, L. (2004). Content validity of the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium’s (ISLLC) Standards for school leaders: To what extent do ISLLCskill indicators describe school leaders’instructional leadership work? A paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council for EducationalAdministration (UCEA), Kansas City, MO.

Murphy, J. (2002). How the ISLLC Standards are reshaping the principalship. Principal, 82 (1), September/October 2002, 22 - 26.

Murphy, J. (2005). Unpacking the foundations of the ISLLC Standards and addressing concerns in the academic community. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41 (1), 154 – 191.

Murphy, J. Yff, J., and Shipman, N. (2000). Implementaion of the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Standards. Leadership in Education, 3 (1), 17 – 39.

New Jersey Association of School Administrators (NJASA). (2008). NJASA membership directory and buying guide. Monroe, New Jersey: Author.

Quinn, T. (2002). Redefining leadership in the standards era. Principal, 82 (1), September/October 2002, 16 – 20.

Rosenberg, M. (2001). The values of school principal evaluation. Education. 212 – 214.

Van Meter, E.J., and McMinn, C.A. (2001). Measuring a leader. Journal of Staff Development, 2 (1), Winter 2001, 32 – 35.

Waters, T., and Kingston, S. (2005). The standards we need. Leadership, 35 (1), 14 – 16, 36 – 39.

Witte, R.S., and Witte, J.S. (1997). Statistics (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace and Company.

Questions & Answers

what is defense mechanism
Chinaza Reply
what is defense mechanisms
Chinaza
I'm interested in biological psychology and cognitive psychology
Tanya Reply
what does preconceived mean
sammie Reply
physiological Psychology
Nwosu Reply
How can I develope my cognitive domain
Amanyire Reply
why is communication effective
Dakolo Reply
Communication is effective because it allows individuals to share ideas, thoughts, and information with others.
effective communication can lead to improved outcomes in various settings, including personal relationships, business environments, and educational settings. By communicating effectively, individuals can negotiate effectively, solve problems collaboratively, and work towards common goals.
it starts up serve and return practice/assessments.it helps find voice talking therapy also assessments through relaxed conversation.
miss
Every time someone flushes a toilet in the apartment building, the person begins to jumb back automatically after hearing the flush, before the water temperature changes. Identify the types of learning, if it is classical conditioning identify the NS, UCS, CS and CR. If it is operant conditioning, identify the type of consequence positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or punishment
Wekolamo Reply
please i need answer
Wekolamo
because it helps many people around the world to understand how to interact with other people and understand them well, for example at work (job).
Manix Reply
Agreed 👍 There are many parts of our brains and behaviors, we really need to get to know. Blessings for everyone and happy Sunday!
ARC
A child is a member of community not society elucidate ?
JESSY Reply
Isn't practices worldwide, be it psychology, be it science. isn't much just a false belief of control over something the mind cannot truly comprehend?
Simon Reply
compare and contrast skinner's perspective on personality development on freud
namakula Reply
Skinner skipped the whole unconscious phenomenon and rather emphasized on classical conditioning
war
explain how nature and nurture affect the development and later the productivity of an individual.
Amesalu Reply
nature is an hereditary factor while nurture is an environmental factor which constitute an individual personality. so if an individual's parent has a deviant behavior and was also brought up in an deviant environment, observation of the behavior and the inborn trait we make the individual deviant.
Samuel
I am taking this course because I am hoping that I could somehow learn more about my chosen field of interest and due to the fact that being a PsyD really ignites my passion as an individual the more I hope to learn about developing and literally explore the complexity of my critical thinking skills
Zyryn Reply
good👍
Jonathan
and having a good philosophy of the world is like a sandwich and a peanut butter 👍
Jonathan
generally amnesi how long yrs memory loss
Kelu Reply
interpersonal relationships
Abdulfatai Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Ncpea education leadership review, volume 10, number 1; february 2009. OpenStax CNX. Jun 05, 2009 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10630/1.9
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Ncpea education leadership review, volume 10, number 1; february 2009' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask