<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
The system of checks and balances in our political system often prevents the federal government from imposing uniform policies across the country. As a result, states and local communities have the latitude to address policy issues based on the specific needs and interests of their citizens. The diversity of public viewpoints across states is manifested by differences in the way states handle access to abortion, distribution of alcohol, gun control, and social welfare benefits, for example.
Federalism also comes with drawbacks. Chief among them are economic disparities across states, race-to-the-bottom dynamics (i.e., states compete to attract business by lowering taxes and regulations), and the difficulty of taking action on issues of national importance.
Stark economic differences across states have a profound effect on the well-being of citizens. For example, in 2014, Maryland had the highest median household income ($73,971), while Mississippi had the lowest ($39,680).
The National Education Association discusses the problem of inequality in the educational system of the United States. Read its proposed solution and decide whether you agree.
The economic strategy of using race-to-the-bottom tactics in order to compete with other states in attracting new business growth also carries a social cost. For example, workers’ safety and pay can suffer as workplace regulations are lifted, and the reduction in payroll taxes for employers has led a number of states to end up with underfunded unemployment insurance programs.
The federal design of our Constitution and the system of checks and balances has jeopardized or outright blocked federal responses to important national issues. President Roosevelt’s efforts to combat the scourge of the Great Depression were initially struck down by the Supreme Court. More recently, President Obama’s effort to make health insurance accessible to more Americans under the Affordable Care Act immediately ran into legal challenges
The benefits of federalism are that it can encourage political participation, give states an incentive to engage in policy innovation, and accommodate diverse viewpoints across the country. The disadvantages are that it can set off a race to the bottom among states, cause cross-state economic and social disparities, and obstruct federal efforts to address national problems.
Beer, Samuel H. 1998. To Make a Nation: The Rediscovery of American Federalism . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Berry, Christopher R. 2009. Imperfect Union: Representation and Taxation in Multilevel Governments . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Derthick, Martha, ed. 1999. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Diamond, Martin. 1981. The Founding of the American Democratic Republic . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Elazar, Daniel J. 1992. Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal and Autonomy Arrangements . Harlow, Essex: Longman Current Affairs.
Grodzins, Morton. 2004. “The Federal System.” In American Government Readings and Cases , ed. P. Woll. New York: Pearson Longman, 74–78.
LaCroix, Alison. 2011. The Ideological Origins of American Federalism . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 2004. The Search for American Political Development . New York: Cambridge University Press.
O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr., and Robert K. Christensen, eds. 2012. American Intergovernmental Relations: Foundations, Perspectives, and Issues . Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
Peterson, Paul E. 1995. The Price of Federalism . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Watts, Ronald L. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems . 2nd ed. Kingston, Ontario: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'American government' conversation and receive update notifications?