<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
The truncate-and-delay design procedure is the simplest and most obvious FIR design procedure.
Is it any Good?
Yes; in fact it's optimal! (in a certain sense)
find , maximizing the energy difference between the desired response and the actual response: i.e., find by Parseval's relationship
The best we can do is let Thus , is optimal in a least-total-sqaured-error ( , or energy) sense!
Why, then, is this design often considered undersirable?
For desired spectra with discontinuities, the least-square designs are poor in a minimax(worst-case, or ) error sense.
Apply a more gradual truncation to reduce "ringing" ( Gibb's Phenomenon )
The window design procedure (except for the boxcar window) is ad-hoc and not optimal in any usual sense. However, it isvery simple, so it is sometimes used for "quick-and-dirty" designs of if the error criterion is itself heurisitic.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Digital filter design' conversation and receive update notifications?