-
Home
- 2010 nsf advance workshop:
- 2010 nsf advance workshop:
- Understanding the promotion &
Anticipate whom you would want to write letters and get to know those individuals
Factors considered
- Research
- Teaching
- Service
These factors combine to reach a decision, BUT the specific combination varies widely across institutions
Research
Publications
- Used to assess your productivity
- Numbers vary widely among disciplines
- Type of publications expected also vary widely
- Different expectations at different promotion points
- Used to assess the quality of work produced
- Citations, H-factor, Impact on the field
Research
Publications
- Demonstrate your contributions
- Provide evidence of your unique contributions, particularly in collaborative/cross-disciplinary activities
- Issues of collaborators
- How many? How much of your time?
- Issues of cross-disciplinarity
- Why did this matter? What did you and your discipline contribute?
Research
- Grants — important national review of work
- Demonstrate ability to secure funding for research
- Presentations
- Invitations reflect status in the field
- Visibility/Engagement/Focus
- Present at multiple conferences
- Engage the leaders at those conferences
- Invite leaders to your institution via department events
- Reflect on level of focus in work and, if broad, engage multiple communities
Teaching
- Effectiveness
- Often evaluated by students
- Ask assigned or selected mentor to provide review
- Innovation
- Think about ways to do it better/more effectively
- Engage students
- Range/breadth
- Assignments may be focused or broad
- Be prepared to teach beyond your comfort zone
- Enthusiasm
- Convey why you love what you do
-
Occasionally volunteer for something extra
Teaching
- Develop a portfolio of your teaching
- Syllabi
- Handouts, other notes on courses developed
- Problem sets
- Other written materials
- Computer-based materials, notes on courseware
- Copies of software developed for courses
- Examinations
- Copies of graded papers where there is a significant writing component
- Evaluation by a colleague
- Student evaluations
Service
- Department
- Help your department accomplish the faculty’s goals
- University
- Engage in the broad community, but
wisely — most P/T committees are broad
- National Organizations
- Choose wisely for visibility with minimum time
- Civic/K12/Outreach Opportunities
- Choose wisely, but make a difference
Keeping a complete record
Keep your CV up to date
- Include students mentored at all levels (primary and secondary mentoring)
- Undergraduates
- Graduate Students
- Post-doctoral Associates
- Include advising responsibilities at all levels
- Refereed publications
- Some institutions request an evaluation of % effort on each
- Citations — check your “h-factor”
- Abstracts / Conference Proceedings/Presentations
- Seminars/Workshops/Panels/etc.
- Posters
- Invited talks at meetings
- Service within university, in community, at (inter)national level
- Ask your institution about frequency and nature of performance reviews
- Can be very helpful in guiding activities
- Opportunity for mid-term feedback
- Provide an internal view of accomplishments
- Some may have external letters
- Dossier can be similar to promotion dossier
Are there answers to my questions?
- How many publications do I need?
- How much grant funding?
- How many graduate students? Postdocs?
- How many committees? Which ones?
- How good must my teaching be? Does it matter?
- How do I know if I’m doing enough?
There are no “right” answers to these questions, because the process is a composite of all of these and varies from place to place:
FIND OUT WHAT YOU CAN ABOUT YOUR INSTITUTION - ASK QUESTIONS!!!
Questions?
Ask many, ask often….
Source:
OpenStax, 2010 nsf advance workshop: negotiating the ideal faculty position. OpenStax CNX. Feb 11, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11275/1.4
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.