<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Many problems in structural biology, require a researcher to understand the shape of a protein. At first glance, this may seem obvious. By opening a molecular visualizer, one can easily see the shape of a protein. But what about calculating the surface area or volume of the protein? What about performing analyses of the surface, such as looking for concave pockets in a protein that might be binding sites for other molecules? What about calculating the volume and shape of those empty binding pockets, in order to find molecules that might fit in them? What about determining whether a particular small molecule can fit in a binding pocket?
All of these problems require some formal notion of the shape of a protein. A protein structure file usually provides no more information than a list of atom locations in space and their types. It will be assumed that for any given application, a radius may be defined for each atom type. This leads to the space filling representation of a protein, in which each atom is treated as an impenetrable sphere. This representation allows for visualization, but it brings us no closer to being able to computationally decide which parts of which atoms are on the surface of the protein and which are buried inside the structure. Some additional tool is needed to capture notions of interior and exterior and spatial adjacency.
Using the sphere model for atoms, one way to define the shape of a molecule is as the union of (possibly overlapping) balls in . Since proteins inside our cells are in an aqueous environment, considering a protein's interactions with solvent molecules, particularly water, is very important forappropriately modeling them. Recall that one of the phenomena that determines the structure of a protein is the hydrophobic effect: some amino acid residues are stabilized by the presence of water, and others are repelled. The extent of the interaction of a protein with the surrounding waterdepends on the surface area of the protein that can be reached by water molecules. Therefore, quantitave modeling of the strength of interaction with solvent often involves computing the solvent accessible surface area (SASA) . Computing SASA can be done by regarding each solvent molecule as a sphere of set radius. This is of course a simplification, since water molecules are not spherical. When thissphere rolls about the molecule, its center delineates the SASA. One can think of the SASA of a molecule as the result of growing each atom sphere bythe radius of the solvent sphere. Instead, by taking what is swept out by the front of the solvent sphere, we obtain the molecular surface (MS) model of the molecule. Alternatively, the MS can be obtained by removing a layer ofsolvent radius depth from the SASA model. The surface determined by SASA analysis depends on the size of a typical solvent molecule. The larger the solvent, the less contoured the resulting surface will appear, because a larger probe molecules would not be able to fit into some of the interatomic spaces that a smaller one would.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Geometric methods in structural computational biology' conversation and receive update notifications?