| << Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
As with calcium complexation, nucleation poisoning must rely on the formation of small calcium oxide/hydroxide templates in the pore water of cement pastes before silicate tetrahedra can condense into dimeric and oligomeric silicates to form C–S–H. Inhibition by nucleation poisoning is where the retarder blocks the growth of C–S–H or Ca(OH) 2 crystals through inhibiting agglomerates of calcium ions from forming the necessary hexagonal pattern. Nucleation inhibitors act on the surface of small clusters, therefore, less than one molecule of retarder per calcium ion is required to produce dramatic results. This type of inhibition also results in an increase in the amount of silicate ions in solution, as condensation of silicate chains onto calcium oxide templates to form the C–S–H is inhibited. As a retarder sucrose acts via nucleation poisoning/surface adsorption.
Surface adsorption of inhibitors directly onto the surface of either the anhydrous or (more likely) the partially hydrated mineral surfaces blocks future reactions with water. In addition, if such inhibitors are large and anionic, then they produce a negative charge at the surface of the cement grains, causing the grains to repel each other thereby reducing inter-particle interactions. Lignosulfonates are typical of retarders that act via surface adsorption.
The formation of a protective coating with its subsequent bursting due to the build up of osmotic pressure was originally posited to explain the existence of the induction period in C3S and cement hydration, however it may be applied to inhibition in general. In this mechanism, a semi-permeable layer at the surface of the cement grain forms and slows down the migration of water and lengthens the induction period. Osmosis will drive water through the semi-permeable membrane towards the unhydrated mineral, and eventually the flow of water creates higher pressure inside the protective coating and the layer bursts. Hydration is then allowed to continue at a normal rate.
A detailed study of several retarders (in particular the organic phophonates) has shown that the actually accelerate certain stages of the hydration process. This is unexpected since the phosphonates have been termed “super retarders,” due to their increased effect on cement hydration relative to the effect of conventional retarders. So how is it that a retarder can be so efficient at hydration inhibition at the same time as accelerating the process? The ability of phosphonates to retard cement setting is due to the lengthening the induction period, without slowing down the time it takes for setting to occur (once the acceleratory period has begun).
Phosphonates are known to complex calcium and other M 2+ cations, poison the nucleation and growth of barium sulfate crystals, and inhibit the hydration of Fe 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 surfaces via direct surface adsorption, thus it was assumed that with regard to cement hydration inhibition occurred by one of these mechanism. However, the mechanism by which phosphonates inhibit cement hydration consists of two steps. First dissolution, whereby calcium is extracted from the surface of the cement grains ( [link] a) exposing the aluminum rich surface to enhanced (catalyzes) hydration and ettringite formation ( [link] b). Second precipitation, whereby the soluble calcium-phosphonate oligomerizes either in solution or on the hydrate surface to form an insoluble polymeric Ca-phosphonate ( [link] c). The Ca-phosphonate material binds to the surface of the cement grains inhibiting further hydration by acting as a diffusion barrier to water as well as a nucleation inhibitor.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Portland cement in the energy industry' conversation and receive update notifications?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|