<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
where and . The fact that the filter bank is associated with waveletsis precisely because . More generally, for a filter bank with filters of length to be associated with wavelets, . This is expected since for filters of length to be associated with wavelets we have seen (from the Householder factorization)that there are parameters . Our second example belongs to a class of unitary filter banks called modulated filter banks , which is described in a following section. A Type 1 modulated filter bank with filters of length and associated with a wavelet orthonormal basis is defined by
where and [link] , [link] . Consider a three-band example with length six filters.In this case, , and therefore one has one projection and the matrix . The projection is one-dimensional and given by the Householder parameter
The third example is another Type 1 modulated filter bank with and . The filters are given in [link] . had the following factorization
where is a two-dimensional projection (notice the arbitrary choice of and ) given by
and
Notice that there are infinitely many choices of and that give rise to the same projection .
In [link] , Theorem 7 , while discussing the properties of -band wavelet systems, we saw that the lowpass filter ( in the notation used there) must satisfy the linear constraint . Otherwise, a scaling function with nonzero integral could not exit.It turns out that this is precisely the only condition that an FIR unitary filter bank has to satisfy in order for it to generatean -band wavelet system [link] , [link] . Indeed, if this linear constraint is not satisfied the filter bank does not generate a wavelet system. This single linear constraint (for unitary filter banks) also impliesthat for (because of Eqn. [link] ). We now give the precise result connecting FIR unitary filter banks and wavelet tight frames.
Theorem 46 Given an FIR unitary filter bank with , there exists an unique, compactly supported, scaling function (with support in , assuming is supported in ) determined by the scaling recursion :
Define wavelets, ,
and functions, ,
Then forms a tight frame for . That is, for all
Also,
Remark: A similar result relates general FIR (not necessarily unitary) filter banks and -band wavelet frames [link] , [link] , [link] .
Starting with [link] , one can calculate the scaling function using either successive approximationor interpolation on the -adic rationals—i.e., exactly as in the two-band case in Chapter [link] . Equation [link] then gives the wavelets in terms of the scaling function. As in the two-band case, the functions , so constructed, invariably turn out highly irregular and sometimes fractal. Thesolution, once again, is to require that several moments of the scaling function (or equivalently the moments of the scaling filter ) are zero. This motivates the definition of -regular -band scaling filters: A unitary scaling filter is said to be regular if its -transform can be written in the form
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Wavelets and wavelet transforms' conversation and receive update notifications?