2.1 Responsible choice for appropriate technology  (Page 11/11)

Viii. jeopardy for responsible technological choice

These exercises using the format of Jeopardy will help you learn the vocabulary of responsible technological choice. Click on the media file and download the Jeopardy as a PowerPoint. To play the game, simply put the PowerPoint in presentation mode. Several of the slides also have links to information slides that explain further the relation between question and answer.

Socio-technical systems in incident at morales

More jeopardy on socio-technical systems

Cases of responsible technological choice

Presentation: training responsible agents for global contexts

Technology choice jeopardy

Socio-technical systems, technology, and human capabilities

Sts powerpoint

Writing cases pesentation

Technology choice presentation

Ix.bibliography

1. Downey, Gary and Juan Lucena. “Are Globalization, Diversity, and Leadership Variations of the Same Problem?: Moving Problem Definition to the Core.” Distinguished Lecture to the American Society for Engineering Education, Chicago, Illinois 2006.
2. Feenberg, Andrew. (2002). Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford, UL: Oxford University Press.
3. Feenberg, Andrew. (1999). Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.
4. Fingarette, H. (1971). The Meaning of Criminal Insanity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 186-187.
5. M. Flanagan, D. Howe, and H. Nissenbaum, “Embodying Values in Technology: Theory and Practice,” in Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, Jeroen van den Hoven and John Weckert, Eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 322-353.
6. Ford, D. (1981). A Reporter At Large: Three Mile Island. In The New Yorker, April 6, 1981: 49-106.
7. Harris, Charles. (2008). “The Good Engineer: Giving Virtue its Due in Engineering Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14: 153-164.
8. Heilbroner, R.L. (2009). Do Machines Make History? In Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future, Johnson, D.G. and Wetmore, J.M., (Eds.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 97-106.
9. Hickman, L. (1990). John Dewey’s Pragmatic Technology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press: 140-153.
10. Hickman, L. (2001) Philosophical Tools for Technological Culture: Putting Pragmatism to Work. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
11. Huff, C. “What is a Socio-Technical System?” From Computing Cases website. http://computingcases.org/general_tools/sia/socio_tech_system.html. Accessed January 10, 2012.
12. Huff, C. and Finholt, T. (1994). Social Issues In Computing: Putting Computing in its Place. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Kenneth L. Kraemer, Jason Dedrick, AND Prakul Sharma. "One Laptop Per Child: Vision versus Reality." Communications of the ACM. June 2009, Vol. 52, No. 6: 66-73
14. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Lucena, J., J. Schneider, and J.A. Leydens. Engineering and Sustainable Community Development, Morgan and Claypool, 2010.
16. Mason, J. (1979). The accident that shouldn't have happened: An analysis of Three Mile Island. In IEEE Spectrum, November 1979: 33-42.
17. Martha Nussbaum. Frontiers in Justice: Disabilities, Nationalities, Species Membership . Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2006.
18. Nussbaum, Martha C. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011: 20, 33-34.
19. Wanda J. Orlikowski. Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2000 INFORMS. Vol. 11, No. 4, July–August 2000, pp. 404–428
20. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living With High-Risk Technologies. Basic Books.
21. Roopali Phadke. “People’s Science in Action: The Politics of Protest and Knowledge Brokering in India.” In Technology and Society, Johnson and Wetmore eds. MIT Press, 2009, 499-513.
22. Pinch, T.J. and Bijker, W. (2009). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts. In Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future, Johnson, D.G. and Wetmore, J.M., (Eds.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 107-139.
23. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Robeyns, Ingrid, "The Capability Approach", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/capability-approach. Accessed March 12, 2012.
25. Schumacher, E. F. Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered, Harper Prennial, 1973/2010: 188-201.
26. Amartya Sen. Development as Freedom . Alfred D. Knopf, INC, 1999.
27. Sismondo, S. (2004). An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing: 51-52.
28. Stephen Smith. (2008). Ending Global Poverty: A Guide to What Works . Macmillan: p. 11 and following.
29. Trent, March. (1992). The AES Corporation: Management Institute for Environment and Business. In Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 5th Edition. Donaldson, T. and Werhane, P. (Eds.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall: 424-440.
30. Weber, Rachel N. "Manufacturing Gender in Commercial and Military Cockpit Design." Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol. 22, No. 2. (Spring, 1997), pp. 235-253. http://www.jstor.org Tue Jan 2 16:14:06 2007
31. Werhane, P., S.P. Kelley, L.P. Hartmen, D.J. Moberg. Allievating Poverty through Profitable Partnerships: Globalization, Markets and Economic Well-Being, Routledge, 2010: 21, 26-7, 75-85, 91.
32. Jamison Wetmore. “Amish Technology: Reinforcing Values and Building Community” in Technology and Society, eds. Johnson and Wetmore. 2009, MIT Press: 298-318
33. White, Leslie. (1949). The Science of Culture. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 366.
34. Winner, L. (2009). Do Artifacts Have Politics? In Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future, Johnson, D.G. and Wetmore, J.M., (Eds.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 209-226.
35. Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press paperback edition.AppendixYour first item here
36. Winter, S. (1990). “Bull Durham and the Uses of Theory.” Stanford Law Review 42: 639-693.
37. Supplemental definition of appropriate technology found at Portal: Appropriate Technology. http://www.appropedia.org/Portal:Appropriate_technology.