<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
We have seen that C62x CPU has 8 functional units. Each assembly instruction is executed in one of these 8 functionalunits, and it takes exactly one clock cycle for the execution. Then, while one instruction is being executed inone of the functional units, what are other 7 functional units doing? Can other functional units execute other instructionsat the same time?
The answer is YES. Thus, the CPU can execute maximum 8 instructions in each clock cycle. The instructions executedin the same clock cycle are called parallel instructions . Then, what instructions can be executed in parallel? A short answer is: as far as the parallelinstructions do not use the same resource of the CPU, they can be put in parallel. For example, the following twoinstructions do not use the same CPU resource and they can be executed in parallel.
1 ADD .L1 A0,A1,A2
2 || ADD .L2 B0,B1,B2
Then, what are the constraints on the parallel instructions? Let's look at the resource constraints in more detail.
This is simple. Each functional unit can execute only one instruction per each clock cycle. In other words,instructions using the same functional unit cannot be put in parallel.
If you look at the data path diagram of the C62x CPU, there
exists only one cross path from B register file to the
L1
,
M1
and
S1
functional units. This means the
cross path can be used only once per each clock cycle.Thus, the following parallel instructions are invalid
because the 1x cross path is used for both instructions.
1 ADD .L1x A0,B1,A22 || MPY .M1x A5,B0,A3
The same rule holds for the 2x cross path from the A
register file to the
L2
,
M2
and
S2
functional units.
The
D
units are used for load and
store instructions. If you examine the C62x data pathdiagram, the addresses for load/store can be obtained from
either A or B side using the multiplexers connectingcrisscross to generate the addresses
DA1
and
DA2
.
Thus, the instructions such as
1 LDW .D2 *B0, A1
is valid.
The functional unit must be on the
same side as the address source register (address index in
B0
and therefore
D2
above), because
D1
and
D2
units
must receive the addresses from A and B sides,respectively.
Another constraint is that while loading a register in one register file from memory, you cannot simultaneously storea register in the same register file to memory. For example, the following parallel instructions are invalid:
1 LDW .D1 *A0, A1
2 || STW .D2 A2, *B0
You cannot have more than four reads from the same register in each clock cycle. Thus, thefollowing is invalid:
1 ADD .L1 A1, A1, A2
2 || MPY .M1 A1, A1, A33 || SUB .D1 A1, A4, A5
A register cannot be written to more than once in a single
clock cycle. However, note that the actual writing toregisters may not occur in the same clock cycle during
which the instruction is executed. For example, the
MPY
instruction writes to the
destination register in the next clock cycle. Thus, thefollowing is valid:
1 ADD .L1 A1, A1, A2
2 || MPY .M1 A1, A1, A2
The following two instructions (not parallel) are invalid (why?):
1 MPY .M1 A1, A1, A2
2 ADD .L1 A3, A4, A2
Some of these write conflicts are very hard to detect and not detected by the assembler. Extra caution should beexercised with the instructions having nonzero delay slots.
At this point, you might have wondered why the C62x CPU
allows parallel instructions and generate so much headachewith the resource constraints, especially with the
instructions with delay slots. And, why not just make the
MPY
instruction take 2 clock cycles to
execute so that we can always use the multiplied resultafter issuing it?
The reason is that by executing instructions in parallel, we can reduce the total execution time of the program. Awell-written assembly program executes as many instructions as possible in each clock cycle to implement the desiredalgorithm.
The reason for allowing delay slots is that although it
takes 2 clock cycles for an
MPY
instruction generate the result, we can execute another
instruction while waiting for the result. This way, you canreduce the clock cycles wasted while waiting for the result
from slow instructions, thus increasing the overallexecution speed.
However, how can we put instructions in parallel? Although
there's a systematic way of doing it (we will learn a bitlater), at this point you can try to restructure your
assembly code to execute as many instructions as possible inparallel. And, you should try to execute other instructions
in the delay slots of those instructions such as
MPY
,
LDW
,
NOP
s to wait the
instructions produce the results.
(parallel instructions): Modify your assembly program for the inner product computation in the previousexercise to use parallel instructions as much as possible. Also, try to fill the delay slots as much aspossible. Using the code composer's profiling, compare the clock cycles necessary for executing the modifiedprogram. How many clock cycles could you save?
Intentionally left blank.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Finite impulse response' conversation and receive update notifications?