This report summarizes work done as part of the Modeling Spatial Memory with Place Cells PFUG under Rice University's VIGRE program. VIGRE is a program of Vertically Integrated Grants for Research and Education in the Mathematical Sciences under the direction of the National Science Foundation. A PFUG is a group of Postdocs, Faculty, Undergraduates and Graduate students formed round the study of a common problem. This work was studied in the Rice University VIGRE program in the Summer of 2011. In this module, we mathematically model Kneirim's Double Rotation Experiment with a model given by Cox and Gabbiani and analytically discuss the relation between overlapping place fields and synaptic input weights.
Background: place cells in the hippocampus
Biology
Spatial memory is what allows us to keep track of our location in space by making mental maps of each environment. Let's consider what happens in the brain during the process of forming these internal maps.
Connections, called synapses, between certain neurons strengthen or weaken–a process known as synaptic plasticity. The strength, or weight, of a synapse controls how much one neuron can affect another. Synaptic plasticity is necessary for memory formation
[link] .
While many neurons are involved with spatial memory, our focus is upon neurons in the hippocampus called place cells
[link] . Place cells have a unique firing pattern. When an environment becomes familiar, each place cell becomes associated with one area of the environment. In other words, after repeated exposure to one environment, a place cell will come to spike in only one area of the environment, which is called that cell's place field
[link] . See
[link] .
Due to place cells' characteristic firing pattern where a cell has a single place field in each environment, it is easy to test if a rat recognizes the environment they have been placed in by examining place cell activity.
Motivation: double rotation experiment
Our research on place cells is based off of the Double Rotation Experiment (DRE) conducted by our collaborator Dr. Knierim
[link] .
Using Social Identity Theory, explain how group membership influences individual behavior and intergroup dynamics.
Provide examples of how in-group favoritism and out-group bias manifest in real-world scenarios, such as in schools, workplaces, or communities. What strategies can be employed to mitigate negative intergroup behaviors rooted in social identity?
of course group membership can contribute in influencing an individual behaviour this is because when ever an individual associate with other group members he or she try to adopt their behaviour in one way or the other because human beings are very dynamic