<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Showing that a limit does not exist

Show that lim x 0 | x | x does not exist. The graph of f ( x ) = | x | / x is shown here:

A graph of a function with two segments. The first exists for x<0, and it is a line with no slope that ends at the y axis in an open circle at (0,-1). The second exists for x>0, and it is a line with no slope that begins at the y axis in an open circle (1,0).

Suppose that L is a candidate for a limit. Choose ε = 1 / 2 .

Let δ > 0 . Either L 0 or L < 0 . If L 0 , then let x = δ / 2 . Thus,

| x 0 | = | δ 2 0 | = δ 2 < δ

and

| | δ 2 | δ 2 L | = | −1 L | = L + 1 1 > 1 2 = ε .

On the other hand, if L < 0 , then let x = δ / 2 . Thus,

| x 0 | = | δ 2 0 | = δ 2 < δ

and

| | δ 2 | δ 2 L | = | 1 L | = | L | + 1 1 > 1 2 = ε .

Thus, for any value of L , lim x 0 | x | x L .

Got questions? Get instant answers now!
Got questions? Get instant answers now!

One-sided and infinite limits

Just as we first gained an intuitive understanding of limits and then moved on to a more rigorous definition of a limit, we now revisit one-sided limits. To do this, we modify the epsilon-delta definition of a limit to give formal epsilon-delta definitions for limits from the right and left at a point. These definitions only require slight modifications from the definition of the limit. In the definition of the limit from the right, the inequality 0 < x a < δ replaces 0 < | x a | < δ , which ensures that we only consider values of x that are greater than (to the right of) a . Similarly, in the definition of the limit from the left, the inequality δ < x a < 0 replaces 0 < | x a | < δ , which ensures that we only consider values of x that are less than (to the left of) a .

Definition

Limit from the Right: Let f ( x ) be defined over an open interval of the form ( a , b ) where a < b . Then,

lim x a + f ( x ) = L

if for every ε > 0 , there exists a δ > 0 such that if 0 < x a < δ , then | f ( x ) L | < ε .

Limit from the Left: Let f ( x ) be defined over an open interval of the form ( b , c ) where b < c . Then,

lim x a f ( x ) = L

if for every ε > 0 , there exists a δ > 0 such that if δ < x a < 0 , then | f ( x ) L | < ε .

Proving a statement about a limit from the right

Prove that lim x 4 + x 4 = 0 .

Let ε > 0 .

Choose δ = ε 2 . Since we ultimately want | x 4 0 | < ε , we manipulate this inequality to get x 4 < ε or, equivalently, 0 < x 4 < ε 2 , making δ = ε 2 a clear choice. We may also determine δ geometrically, as shown in [link] .

A graph showing how to find delta for the above proof. The function f(x) = sqrt(x-4) is drawn for x > 4. Since the proposed limit is 0, lines y = 0 + epsilon and y = 0 – epsilon are drawn  in blue. Since only the top blue line corresponding to y = 0 + epsilon intersects the function, one red line is drawn from the point of intersection to the x axis. This x value is found by solving sqrt(x-4) = epsilon, or x = epsilon squared + 4. Delta is then the distance between this point and 4, which is epsilon squared.
This graph shows how we find δ for the proof in [link] .

Assume 0 < x 4 < δ . Thus, 0 < x 4 < ε 2 . Hence, 0 < x 4 < ε . Finally, | x 4 0 | < ε .

Therefore, lim x 4 + x 4 = 0 .

Got questions? Get instant answers now!
Got questions? Get instant answers now!

Find δ corresponding to ε for a proof that lim x 1 1 x = 0 .

δ = ε 2

Got questions? Get instant answers now!

We conclude the process of converting our intuitive ideas of various types of limits to rigorous formal definitions by pursuing a formal definition of infinite limits. To have lim x a f ( x ) = + , we want the values of the function f ( x ) to get larger and larger as x approaches a . Instead of the requirement that | f ( x ) L | < ε for arbitrarily small ε when 0 < | x a | < δ for small enough δ , we want f ( x ) > M for arbitrarily large positive M when 0 < | x a | < δ for small enough δ . [link] illustrates this idea by showing the value of δ for successively larger values of M .

Two graphs side by side. Each graph contains two curves above the x axis separated by an asymptote at x=a. The curves on the left go to infinity as x goes to a and to 0 as x goes to negative infinity. The curves on the right go to infinity as x goes to a and to 0 as x goes to infinity. The first graph has a value M greater than zero marked on the y axis and a horizontal line drawn from there (y=M) to intersect with both curves. Lines are drawn down from the points of intersection to the x axis. Delta is the smaller of the distances between point a and these new spots on the x axis. The same lines are drawn on the second graph, but this M is larger, and the distances from the x axis intersections to point a are smaller.
These graphs plot values of δ for M to show that lim x a f ( x ) = + .

Definition

Let f ( x ) be defined for all x a in an open interval containing a . Then, we have an infinite limit

lim x a f ( x ) = +

if for every M > 0 , there exists δ > 0 such that if 0 < | x a | < δ , then f ( x ) > M .

Let f ( x ) be defined for all x a in an open interval containing a . Then, we have a negative infinite limit

lim x a f ( x ) =

if for every M > 0 , there exists δ > 0 such that if 0 < | x a | < δ , then f ( x ) < M .

Key concepts

  • The intuitive notion of a limit may be converted into a rigorous mathematical definition known as the epsilon-delta definition of the limit .
  • The epsilon-delta definition may be used to prove statements about limits.
  • The epsilon-delta definition of a limit may be modified to define one-sided limits.
Practice Key Terms 2

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Calculus volume 1. OpenStax CNX. Feb 05, 2016 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11964/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Calculus volume 1' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask